Write 5 7/8 as an improper fraction

2 answers:

Klio2033 [76]3 years ago

7 0

Well to find an improper fraction is where the numerator is bigger than the denominator and to find out the answer you would do 5 x 8 = 40 then + 7 so the improper fraction is 47/8

Likurg_2 [28]3 years ago

6 0

5 7/8 is 47/8

Because,

You multiply 5 and 8 and then add 7, then you keep the denominator.

You might be interested in

The number of bacteria after t hours is given by N(t)=250 e^0.15t a) Find the initial number of bacteria and the rate of growth

Art [367]

Answer:

a) $N_0=250\; k=0.15$

b) 334,858 bacteria

c) 4.67 hours

d) 2 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Initial number of bacteria is the coefficient, that is, 250. And the growth rate is the coefficient besides “t”: 0.15. It’s rate of growth because of its positive sign; when it’s negative, it’s taken as rate of decay.

Another way to see that is the following:

Initial number of bacteria is N(0), which implies $t=0$ . And $N(0)=N_0$ . The process is:

$N(t)=250 e^{0.15t}\\N(0)=250 e^{0.15(0)}\\ N_0=250e^{0}\\N_0=250\cdot1\\ N_0=250$

b) After 2 days means $t=48$ . So, we just replace and operate:

$N(t)=250 e^{0.15t}\\N(48)=250 e^{0.15(48)}\\ N(48)=250e^{7.2}\\N(48)=334,858\;\text{bacteria}$

c) $N(t_1)=4000; \;t_1=?$

$N(t)=250 e^{0.15t}\\4000=250 e^{0.15t_1}\\ \dfrac{4000}{250}= e^{0.15t_1}\\16= e^{0.15t_1}\\ \ln{16}= \ln{e^{0.15t_1}} \\ \ln{16}=0.15t_1 \\ \dfrac{\ln{16}}{0.15}=t_1=4.67\approx 5\;h$

d) $t_2=?\; (N_0→3N_0 \Longrightarrow 250 → 3\cdot250 =750)$

$N(t)=250 e^{0.15t}\\ 750=250 e^{0.15t_2} \\ \ln{3} =\ln{e^{0.15t_2}}\\ t_2=\dfrac{\ln{3}}{0.15} = 2.99 \approx 3\;h$

6 0

3 years ago

Here is a histogram displaying the top 30 lifetime batting averages in baseball history. This distribution of data shows lots of

Evgesh-ka [11]

The correct answer to this question is letter "<span> C. There may be other hitters in the 320s, but they didn't make the top 30." </span>his distribution of data shows lots of lifetime averages in the middle classes, but tails off sharply at both the upper and lower ends. The statement that best explains the fact that there are very few averages in the lowest class is that t<span>here may be other hitters in the 320s, but they didn't make the top 30.</span>

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which number is irrational?

balandron [24]

Answer:

I need to know the numbers then Im able to help :3

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please answer right I will give you brainliest :)