That is actually in the math section not Social Studies, but I'm going to answer it anyways. What you need to do here is to leave x alone, "How do you do that?" Well, to do that you need to take out the 23 to just leave 3x alone, "How do you take out the 23?" By doing the opposite to both sides. In this case, the 23 is negative, so we add 23 to both sides. If it was positive, you subtract 23 from both sides. Now that we have added 23 to both sides, we are left with 3x=36, "What do you do now?' We still do the opposite, this time we are multiplying 3 times X, and the opposite for this is division, so we have to divide 3 to both sides to leave X alone. Now that we have divide 3 to both sides, it will leave us with X=12. YOU'RE WELCOME :)
Answer:
Explanation:
As per the Median Voter theorem expresses that " a greater part rule casting a ballot framework will choose the result generally favored by the middle voter". In this way, on account of essential political race which is intended to choose a gathering's possibility for position - being referred to .For this situation the Median Voter Theorem functions admirably in light of the fact that right now competitor need to appreciate the benefits of " Median voter Theorem" where as in the General political race which is intended to choose who possesses the position itself however in these sort of situations where a typical arrangement is accessible Median voter Theorem has it's constraints and all in all races each applicant needs to take distinctive situation on various subjects and general decisions are not uni dimensional and a large portion of the occasions these positions are politically spurred thus, that is the reason up-and-comer normally don't follow Median voter Theorem,
Example
Where up-and-comer either endeavored to follow the middle voter - Scenario where there is a nation wide or party shrewd agreement regarding a matter " Issues like battle against debasement" at that point competitor for the most part follow the Median voter hypothesis.
Second part where competitor didn't follow the middle voter hypothesis these are where applicant just need to please it's supporters or certain segment of society "Like reduction in the Tax on the well off" for these situation up-and-comer doesn't follow middle voter hypothesis.
Truly when a competitor chose to doesn't follow middle voter hypothesis applicant carried on deliberately ,in light of the fact that considering up-and-comer this diverse situation from middle voter hypothesis increment there opportunities to win or increment it's prominence in certain area of society .
To the extent the person carried on morally this absolutely has a place with the competitors claim moral standard which can not be summed up.
Answer:
D. They all served in the House of Burgesses.
Explanation:
It is not A, because only Patrick Henry served as governor, in this case the governor of Virginia.
It is not B, because they were fighting for the US independence, and were living in the US, not in Britain. Therefore, they cannot be part of the British Parliament while fighting the British.
George Washington is known for his extensive role as military officer and later commander in chief, and did not play a large role as an ambassador to England, and so it is not C.
<u>Midrange computers</u> are considered as high-end network servers that handle large-scale processing of business applications.
A midrange computer is a computer system which is more powerful than a general-purpose personal computer. So a midrange computer is thus employed as a network server which handle large-scale processing of the business applications.
So the use of a midrange computer is not just limited to businesses, as some people build or purchase midrange systems when there are high-end personal computers are insufficient. Thus, a midrange computer system often retains a large amount of functionality as a stand-alone personal computer.
Hence, option A is correct.
To learn more about midrange computer here:
brainly.com/question/13262932
#SPJ4
Answer:
Union membership increased more than five times between 1900 and 1920.
Explanation:
