The taking-out of material that may offend others is called _____.

2 answers:

7 0

<span>It is censorship. When a material or a program is deemed to offend a certain belief or group of people, media will pull it out of circulation since it does not want to offend anyone. Some protests this because it is a blow to free speech. However, if it cause a great deal of conflict, then it has to be removed or censored.</span>

Ad libitum [116K]3 years ago

7 0

The taking-out of material which may be offensive to certain spheres of people would be called censorship. If you dislike something I write and you want it to be taken out (if I'm writing a book for example), you could censor me by throwing these things out of my book and you could argue that it had offended you and that you didn't want it to be in the book for that reason.

You might be interested in

John Stuart Mill, a pioneer of Utilitarian ethics, sought to find an objective morality through an ontological basis of morality

taurus [48]

Answer:

B. False

Explanation:

John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) was a master in political philosophy and he focused mainly on Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is defined as a moral theory which encourages happiness and the need to reduce any form of sadness/unhappiness through various methods.

His main goal was to justify the principle around utilitarian as the foundation of morality which says that actions are right when they promote happiness and wrong when they promote sadness.

3 0

4 years ago

Which of these is a sign that a country is considered to be "developed"?

marishachu [46]

The answer is A) low literacy rate

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

For the past week, Christopher has been studying for his first American History exam. Christopher plans to transfer and eventual

jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

He might not have done this things

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the United States, who has the power to declare war?

olganol [36]

Only Congress may declare war.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

analyze the following cartoon from the publication puck, published in 1900, titled divorce the lesser evil. what can be inferred

Flura [38]

The cartoon from the 1900 publication was titled <em>"Divorce the Lesser Evil."</em>

This was the argument of the Justice while the Church representative pleaded with the Justice to stop the fire being ignited against marriages with the immorality of divorce.

This cartoon depicted the start of government interference or intervention in marriages by granting couples the legal right to divorce in the courts of law.

From the artist's depiction, we can infer that marriage was being regarded as an unnecessary contract that could be terminated at will during government-sponsored and sanctioned divorce. From that period, Marriage started losing its covenant-for-life characteristics.

At that progressive era, it was regarded as a better option to allow unhappy couples to go their separate ways and even remarry. There was no thought spared for the children of such unhappy marriages and divorces.

Thus, today, after more than 100 years, the results have been revised. Nations where divorce is allowed have multiplied in immorality. Families have been scattered. Children are adversely affected. And the world is not a better society.

Learn more about divorce at brainly.com/question/11286701

8 0

2 years ago