1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
polet [3.4K]
3 years ago
7

Three 1.0 l bottles each contain the same number of gas particles and are held at the same temperature. bottle a contains only o

xygen particles, bottle b contains only neon particles, and bottle c contains half oxygen and half neon particles. which of the following statements is true? bottle a will have the greatest internal pressure bottle b will have the greatest internal pressure bottle c will have the greatest internal pressure all three bottles will have the same internal pressure
History
1 answer:
docker41 [41]3 years ago
6 0
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the last option. The statement that is true for the three bottles would be that all three bottles will have the same internal pressure. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
You might be interested in
Why do you think Kennedy’s election made Americans optimistic?
Mkey [24]

Answer: They were optimistic about the economy. 64% said that local business conditions would be good that year. And that attitude prevailed throughout the year. Two-thirds (68%) said they were satisfied with their income. Many credited the president. By a margin of 50% to 37%, the public thought Kennedy kept his promise to stimulate economic growth.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the Preaching for Politics happen?
lord [1]

ON NOVEMBER 13, 2016, THE Sunday after the election of Donald Trump, I stepped into the pulpit of St. Barnabas Memorial Church in Falmouth, Massachusetts, to preach. I do this two or three times a month, but it’s fair to say I approached my homiletical responsibility differently that Sunday. The months since November 2016 have buffeted us with report after report of scandal, violence, injustice, and deceit, so it may be worth remembering just what those five days between Tuesday, November 8, and Sunday, November 13, looked and felt like in the United States. At DeWitt Junior High, in my home state of Michigan, white students formed a wall outside the school and barred entry to any student of color. The white students said they were making America great again. A toy doll with brown skin had string tied around its neck and was hanged inside an elevator at Canisius College in Buffalo, New York. At Wellesley College in Massachusetts, students of color were spat upon while entering and exiting the multicultural student center. At San Diego State, a Muslim student was assaulted and her hijab torn from her head. There are many other examples.


These things saddened and frightened me, and as I climbed to the pulpit, I knew I must address them. The question, of course, was not if I should preach about politics, but how, and that question persists months later. Since early 2016 we have been told over and again by pundits and historians alike that our (continuing, unending) political moment is one of absolute singularity, one entirely without precedent. No one has ever campaigned like this, governed like this, spoken like this, lied like this, boasted like this, tweeted like this. So how should one preach in response to all this? What should political preaching look like in the age of Donald Trump? That is one question. But I want to ask a different, related, and perhaps more important one. In the age of Donald Trump, I do not want to ask how one should preach about politics. I want to ask: what will the politics of preaching itself be?

4 0
3 years ago
(REST OF MY POINTS PLEASE HELP) IS NOT C
Phantasy [73]

I believe it's C because the emancipation proclamation it declaring that all slaves in slave states to be free.

3 0
3 years ago
What is the best description of the "Great Compromise"? The agreement on the economy between Northern and Southern interests. An
mina [271]

Answer: B.) The agreement between the House of Representatives and the Senate to agree on creating three branches of government.

Explanation: The conflict that solved through the great compromise revolved around how the states should be represented within the government body. They later on agreed on creating three branches of government that can limit each other's power, and providing states to send their representatives to work within each branches.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After the Missouri Compromise was made into law, Missouri became a free state.
JulijaS [17]

What’s ur question? I’m not sure how to answer

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which line from summary best justifies the conclusion that Harry Potter and the sorcerers stone was influenced by Ancient Greek
    11·1 answer
  • What motivated Native American leader Tecumseh to unite Indian tribes to help the British in the War of 1812?
    11·2 answers
  • Why was british rule in the colonies decentralized? what groups benefited from this and how?
    6·1 answer
  • What is Correggio’s most famous piece?
    15·2 answers
  • The migrations from Asia caused a significant mingling of _____.
    10·1 answer
  • What made Vladimir Lenin a hero or villain?
    5·1 answer
  • Slavery was abolished in Mexico in 1829, but — A)Mexican Texas was allowed to continue the practice Mexican Texas was allowed to
    5·1 answer
  • Communication is
    12·2 answers
  • Which President gave them supplies and authorized the trip for Lewis and
    8·2 answers
  • Which item commonly associated with cattle ranching today most clearly shows the Spanish vaqueros’ influence?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!