IAnswer:
Im not sure how well this use of the information will help you but,
Source: "<em>In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban government and directed the Department of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban Government, and directed the Departments of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. Beyond criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the United States holds $6 billion worth of financial claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, an appropriate response to these unaddressed claims."</em>
Paraphrasing - In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between U. S. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between u. s. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo, that remains in situ these days. on the far side of criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the U.S. holds a $6 billion value of economic claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, Associate in Nursing applicable response to those unaddressed claims.
Explanation:
The "source" is the information where i got it from and the "paraphrased" part is fully rewritten, ps sorry if it's a bit long and wordy! hope this helps have a great day :)
C. states needed to be given more control
When businesses compete everything is great. Eventually one of the businesses in a field gets bigger. And bigger. And bigger. It buys out it's competitors. It monopolizes it's niche filed, sometimes even spreading to others.<span>Since money will no longer be used, people will have access to all of the resources they need, and there will no longer be a state to protect the capitalist's private property, I find it extremely unlikely that a worker would want to exchange his labor for a wage. The way I see it, it would be like playing pretend. The situation would be similar to if a group of people in the United States declared their friend Tim the king of Arkansas.</span>
IF the options are what I think they are then the state that best describes an economic trend that shaped the end of the 20th century is m<span>ore of the products sold in the US were manufactured in foreign countries.
Hope this helped :)</span>
Correct answer choice is:
B. The Great Leap Forward
Explanation:
The Great Leap Forward of the People's Republic of China held a financial and political campaign by a single Communist Party of China from 1958 to 1962.
The Great Leap Forward designed to advance cultivation and manufacturing. Mao considered that both had to develop to enable the other to produce. The production could just benefit if the workforce remained well supported, while the farming operators required industry to build the advanced tools required for modernization. To support for aforementioned, China was transformed into a group of municipalities.
