1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
worty [1.4K]
3 years ago
7

Which best describes the significance of the Magna Carta as a precursor for modern democracy Which best describes the significan

ce of the Magna Carta as a precursor for modern democracy? (1 point)
The Magna Carta established the first legislative body in Europe.

The Magna Carta began to make the ruler responsible under the law.

The Magna Carta freed the English peasant class from arbitrary punishment.

The Magna Carta gave the lords of England authority over each other
History
2 answers:
zhenek [66]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The Magna Carta began to make the ruler responsible under the law.

Explanation:

The Magna Carta is a charter of rights that was signed on June 15, 1215 by King John of England. The document is one of the most important precursors of modern democracy, both for England and for the whole world. It was first drafted by the Archbishop of Canterbury to make peace between the king and the barons. The document began to make the ruler responsible under the law, while also promising the protection of church rights, protection for the barons from illegal imprisonment, access to swift justice, and limitations on feudal payments to the Crown.

Ilia_Sergeevich [38]3 years ago
7 0
The Magna Carta in England was a precursor for modern democracy firstly because It took away total control from the monarchy and dispersed it evenly, furthermore, the Magna Carta began to make the ruler responsible under the law. The correct answer is the second option.
You might be interested in
What were the causes and effects of the scopes trial and racial tension
insens350 [35]

The cause of the Scopes Trial was disagreement about evolution. One side thought that evolution should be taught in schools, while another side said that it shouldn’t. It was also said that teaching of evolution was in violation of Tennessee’s Butler Act which stated that it was unlawful to teach evolution in any state-funded school.

 

It was purposely meant to also bring publicity, but in the end, John Scopes was fined $100 dollars which is equivalent to over $1000 dollars today. Many of the people and reporters went to the “big-shot” lawyers involved in the case so, the lawyers to morph the truth into anything they wished and the public hung on to their words. One thing it teaches is that we need to look at both sides because one side could be changed to what someone wants.

8 0
3 years ago
Overall, absolute monarchs ___changes associated with humanism, secularism,
sineoko [7]

Historical facts show that in general, in relation to the movements described above, absolute monarchies<u> C. resisted them. </u>

<h3>Absolute Monarchies</h3>
  • Controlled the nation entirely.
  • Were opposed to anything that would threaten their power.

When the movements of humanism, secularism, literacy, and the scientific revolution, led to more people being knowledgeable and demanding more rights, absolute monarchies resisted them to protect their power.

In conclusion, option C is correct.

Find out more about the scientific revolution at brainly.com/question/897123.

6 0
2 years ago
How did the countries decide on the site of the United Nations headquarters?
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer:

option 2

Explanation:

233

6 0
3 years ago
What is the constitutional basis for the existence of the implied powers
dangina [55]

Answer:

The power to "make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing powers...."

Explanation:

The "Elastic Clause" of the Constitution grants Congress power to pass unspecified laws These could be "necessary and proper" for the exercise of its expressed powers.

Implied powers have often been controversial

Over time, Congress's powers have grown as more and more kinds of government activity have been accepted as implied powers

6 0
3 years ago
How does Ashley Gilligan believe that the United States has changed since September 11?
Setler [38]

Answer: Since 9/11 the US has been active in wars but is only technically called “in conflict”. 9/11 was only the second act of war on american soil within the century following pearl harbor in 1941. This was also one of the first acts of terrorism using our own property, the planes. The adults that saw this in person or on the news no longer felt safe as we hadn’t had any breaches of security on our own soil and this was an act to instill fear and to start a war. Security at airports have been extremely raised since then and more background checks on visitors from other countrues

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Besides the physical properties studied by physics, panpsychism holds that ordinary
    6·1 answer
  • How might limiting starchy vegetables like potatoes affect students
    15·1 answer
  • How did the cuban missile crisis apply to the cold war?
    8·1 answer
  • Question 9 saved what was a key reason for the south's defeat in the civil war? question 9 options: the confederacy lacked a sin
    7·1 answer
  • Why am I alive? what is the scientific reasoning behind it?
    5·2 answers
  • Name the 3 important social groups and describe each one
    15·1 answer
  • How were many Americans exposed to the ideas of the Federalists? Federal had dominated government since the american revolution​
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these political systems would have a "supreme leader"?
    8·1 answer
  • 26. Which of the following generalizations could be supported by the passage?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!