<h2>
Answer:</h2>
Definitely we can't prove that triangle DFG is congruent to MNP. The reason is because the angles that are congruent don't match the corresponding vertex, that is, the corresponding vertices of these triangles are as follows:
D is corresponding to M
F is corresponding to N
G is corresponding to P
But the angle we know in the first triangle lies on vertex D while on the second triangle the angle lies on vertex P but it should lies on vertex M, so we'd prove they are congruent by Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS).
Answer:
2x · (x-1)
Step-by-step explanation:
2x
I’m pretty sure the answer would be B
The smaller of 2 consecutive integers is -15. The equation to determine the consecutive integers is x + (x + 1) = -29
<u>Solution:</u>
Given that sum of two consecutive integer is -29.
Need to write the equation and determine the smaller of 2 consecutive integers.
Let’s smaller integer be represented by variable x
So bigger consecutive integer will be represented by x + 1
As sum of two integer = -29
=> x + (x + 1) = -29
=> 2x + 1 = -29
=> 2x + 30 = 0 ----------(1)
On solving equation (1) for x we get
2x =-30
=> x = -15
Smallest integer = x = -15
Bigger integer = x + 1 = -15 + 1 = -14
Hence required smaller integer = -15 and required equation is x + (x + 1) = -29
