Answer:
This is what I found on google:
Explanation:
The Code of Hammurabi is a well-preserved Babylonian code of law of ancient Mesopotamia, dated to about 1754 BC (Middle Chronology). ... Nearly half of the code deals with matters of contract, establishing the wages to be paid to an ox driver or a surgeon for example.
So reading this we can say it's written set of laws.
It gave individuals the privilege to vote without having property, as long as they were an assessment paying white man they could vote. States chose to change the way they vote, rather than state governing body they chose to utilize presidential voters by mainstream vote. Jacksonian Democracy additionally had limits, it took away the vote of liberated dark men and Indian men and ladies.
What you basically need to know is that the contras were right-wing and that they opposed the left-wing government.
The left-wing governments were generally not seen as desired during the cold war because they could strengthen the communists, which were competing with the US.
So the US hoped that the contras would weaken or even replace the left-wing government.
Societies should have rules and laws so that everyone can have a basic understanding of legal right and wrong. This way people know where the line is drawn on their actions. The difference between rules and laws, are that while rules may be dictated on solely social means, laws are held to a legal standard with legal punishments for breaking them.
A rule can become a law in a society if the society can agree that it would be dangerous and harmful to the society if that rule were to be broken.
The rule of law is a principle that a nation has standard laws that it rules on, rather than attributing crimes to whatever the leaders find punishable on their own whim. A society without rule of law could mean citizens don't know what is legally okay to do, and they might not understand the severity of their actions since they may be subject to change.
Rule of law affects government leaders since the laws are made public to the people, instead of just opinions carried out by those same leaders. This means that leaders can be held to the same standard of law and can have watchful eyes from their people. This is why transparency plays a big role in rule of law, since citizens may find it unfair if government leaders are held to different standards or no standards at all.
Cultural change, normally associated with the Enlightenment; social change and financial and economic difficulties; and the political actions of the involved parties.