Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Ku Klux Klan wanted to prevent African Americans from exercising their political rights. By 1868, the Klan existed in practically every Southern state. Its overarching goal was to restore white supremacy. Its method was to prevent African Americans from exercising their political rights. Another Klan objective was to turn the Republicans, who had established the Reconstruction governments, out of power.
The amount of back injuries equals approximately 20%. There are around a million injuries and illnesses each year because of work and approximately 20% which is around 200 000, are related to back problems. Sometimes it's falling and hurting yourself and sometimes it's accumulated stress.
<span>Choice (e) is the most correct. Europeans, in general, are more pragmatic than Americans. They tend to see the shades of grey of an issue and can be moved to look at more sides of an issue than Americans, who tend to be immovable in their positions once they do form an opinion.</span>
