Hi. I am not sure if there's more information about your post but I went ahead and research for more similar posts so I can better provide an answer. If you are referring to the passage from Chapter CXLVIII where it talks about the Indian Removal Act, here are my answers:
The research question that this document could help me answer would be:
Why did the United States government want to relocate the native Americans from their lands?
The document could help answer my question because it explains to why they are going to relocate the Natives. Here's the actual document that I found:
An Act to provide for an exchange of lands with the Indians residing in any of the states or territories, and for their removal west of the river Mississippi.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That is shall and may be lawful for the President of the United States to cause so much of any territory belonging to the United States, west of the river Mississippi, not included in any sate or organized territory and to which the Indian title has been extinguished, as he may judge necessary, to be divided into a suitable number of districts for the reception of such tribes or nations of Indians as may choose to exchange the lands where they now reside, and remove there; and to cause each of said districts to be so described by natural or artificial marks, as the easily distinguished from every other...
Tennessee
The State of Franklin was an unrecognized and autonomous territory which is located now in Tennessee. Franklin was created in 1784 from parts of the Appalachian Mountains that were offered to North Carolina as a cession to Congress to pay off debts from Revolutionary War. It later became the state of Tennessee.
Answer:
<h3>Thanks for the free points. </h3><h3>Have a blessed day </h3><h3>Happy 2021❤❤❤</h3>
Allan Bakke had been the subject of a case involving <u>“reverse discrimination” </u>during the carter administration.
In 1978 Allan Bakke applied for admission at medical school and it was declined twice by the University of California, so Bakke filed a suit against the University arguing that he had better scores than the minority groups that were granted access.
At that time, the university had reserved a quota of 16%, as part of affirmative action program, to minority groups. Affirmative action program was designed to provide better educational and employment opportunities to those groups.
In this legal case, Bakke claimed that the use of quota based on race was unfair “reverse discrimination” as according the Civil Right Act, equal protection should be given to all citizens. The Supreme Court, in a highly controversial case, ordered that the university should admit Bakke and declared that affirmative action was constitutional but could not be used in cases of race quotas.
