<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
(This answer is worth 8 points?? Don’t lie about that but I’ll still help.)
You have to find the unit rate of both of them. So divide 8.75/3.5=2.5 so Adam paid 2.5$ per oz
Then let’s find Marcos.
9.75/3.75=2.6 so Marco paid $2.5 per oz.
Adam got the better deal.
Answer:
No
Step-by-step explanation:
600-248.9=351.1, which is how much yarn It's me Patrick has left.
351.1<354.03, so he doesn't have enough yarn left to make the second scarf.
Answer: B) Neither Kelly or Daniel is correct.
A geometric proof is a series of logical reasonings that, starting from a hypothesis, lead to a thesis, using a sequence of statements, axioms, and theorems.
Looking at Kelly's proof, we can say that she is not right. Indeed, she uses the thesis, what she wants to prove, as a justification for her statements.
On the contrary, Daniel uses definitions and properties as a justification for his statements. Although, he does not use the correct justification for statements 1 and 2. Indeed, ∠1 + ∠2 = 180 because they are a linear pair, as well as ∠1 and ∠4.
A linear pair is a pair of adjacent angles formed when two lines intersect, while the supplementary angles definition states that two angles are supplementary when they add to 180 degrees without being necessary next to each other. Since Daniel does not know the effective measure of the angles, he cannot use the definition of supplementary angles.
Hence, neither Kelly or Daniel is correct.
I do believe if you take 55 and subtract 222%, you get <em>122.1</em>. Since 100% of 55 apple pies would be 55, 222% would be more than 55 concluding at <em>122.1</em> apple pies.