FFFFFUUUCCCKKKUUUUUUUUUKKKKKKKKCCCCCCCCCFFFFFFFFFFFF
Answer:
<u>B. There is sufficient evidence that the mean of the pressure required to open a certain valve has changed. </u>
Step-by-step explanation:
We make this conclusion based on these reasons:
- We are told that the "null hypothesis was rejected" after the <em>"manager feels that the pressure variability has changed.,</em> meaning the <u>null hypothesis was the opposite of what occurred; that is to say, it is the alternate hypothesis that proved true instead.</u>
- <em>"changes in the manufacturing process"</em> form what can be called "sufficient evidence" that the mean of the pressure required to open the valve has changed, thereby going against the null hypothesis.
It is based on the above reasons that the null hypothesis was rejected.
Dilation is scale factor, like a dilation scale factor of 2
Answer: The required probability is 0.1923.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have given that
Probability that it's a good dog = 0.4
Probability that it's a bad dog = 1-0.4 = 0.6
Probability that the dog smokes given that its a bad dog = 0.7
Probability that it smokes given that its a good dog = 0.25
According to question, probability of smoking pipe would be
P(good).P(Smoking pipe|good)+P(bad).P(smoking pipe|bad)

So, Probability of getting a good dog given that it is smoking pipe is given by

Hence, the required probability is 0.1923.
Answer:
1079
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello,
18-5 = 13
31-18=13
44-31=13
161=5+13*12
So we need to compute

Thanks