The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
I will look at your profile and see if I can subscribe based on your content
Answer: 26.73%
Explanation:
You can calculate the expected return using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM).
Formula is:
Expected return = Risk free rate + beta * (Market return - risk free rate)
Use the previous figures to solve for the risk free rate:
20.47% = Rf + 1.39 * (16.50% - Rf)
20.47% = Rf + 22.935% - 1.39R
20.47% - 22.935% = Rf - 1.39Rf
-2.465% = -0.39Rf
Rf = -2.465% / -0.39
= 6.32%
New expected return is:
= 6.32% + 1.39 * (21% - 6.32%)
= 26.73%
Answer: When assessing the risks of investment, one should consider the political, economic, and legal risks of doing business in either Russia or Poland. The risk in Russia would probably be considered higher than the risk in Poland since Poland has been a member state of the European Union since 1 May 2004, with the Treaty of Accession 2003 signed on 16 April 2003 in Athens as the legal basis for Poland's accession to the EU.
Poland has already gained benefits and stability offered by the EU. Russia, by contrast, is still many years away from even being in a position to be considered by the EU for membership.
Explanation: A diligent investor wouldn't put a penny in a risky country.