Answer:
In every form of analysis, it is always safer to take a macro or holistic view of the situation. This is true for the investment performance of a manager. One investment decision that went right does not suffice to classify an investment portfolio manager as proficient, neither is one that went south enough to tag him deficient.
The forecasting ability of managers, on the balance of probability, will vary for different cases, with a helicopter view of providing a more accurate measure of their performance.
However, if it was possible to analyse the market for volatility and adjust our forecasts it becomes unnecessary to look at and analyse all the information from a 12-month cycle before coming to terms about the performance of the manager.
Cheers!
<span>World trade refers to the total value of all the exports and imports of the world's nations.</span>
It should be noted that corporate officers have the implied power to bind the firm in matters directly connected to its business.
<h3>Who are corporate officers?</h3>
corporate officers serves as those workers in a company or an organization who are seen as officials and they have allocated duties and responsibilities .
These officers posses the power to bind the firm in matters directly connected to its business.
Learn more about corporate officers at,;
brainly.com/question/24518056
Answer:
comparability of data
Explanation:
Comparability of information is one attribute used only to characterize the consistency of descriptive statistics. For two factors the principle of comparability of data is especially critical to a Triad.
Secondly, the Constellation demonstrates shared data sets. Through nature, the shared data sets include information from different analytical techniques. The degree of comparability among two separate sequencing / technical methods affects the way in which sets of data can be jointly compiled, analyzed and used to help strategic thinking.
Answer:
3.18%
Explanation:
Calculation for the annual increase in the price of the average house sold
We are suppose to use this formula FV = PV (1+r)^t but since we are looking for R the formula to use will be:
R = (FV / PV)^1/16– 1
Let note that 2016-2000 will give us 16 years
Where,
FV=$354,900
PV=$215,100
Let plug in the formula
R= ( $354,900/$215,100 )^1/8)16– 1
R=(1.6499)^1/16-1
R=1.0318-1
R=0.0318×100
R=3.18%
Therefore the annual increase in the price of the average house sold will be 3.18%
