Answer:
see attached
Step-by-step explanation:
In the attached, the feasible region is white, and all excluded regions are shaded. When there are so many inequalities, it is easier to see the solution (feasible region) this way. The boundary lines are dashed because they are not excluded. That is, each boundary line is part of the feasible region.
The vertices of the feasible region are shown to aid in any optimization you might want to do. We have shown the values that would apply if there were a constraint y ≥ 0, which is not on your list. (We assume pounds of Brussels sprouts will not be negative.)
__
If you actually do the shading required by the problem statement, you will be shading on the opposite side of each of the lines shown, and you would draw the lines as solid.
Plan B. to me is he obvious answer.
This equation is written in slope intercept form, y=mx+b, with m being the slope and b being the y-intercept.
The slope of the line is 1.5 and the y-intercept is -2. The answer is A.
I hope this helps ;)
Answer:
5.3 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
Because CD corresponds to BC, the scale factor from triangle ABC to triangle CDE, is 7/8. Now, DE corresponds to AB, so to get DE, we must multiply the value of AB by 7/8. 6 times 7/8 is 5.25, and rounding to the nearest tenth of a foot, the value of DE is 5.3.
C. would be the correct device to use in trials.
But the actual probability is:
(1-1/4)^5
243/1024
(about 23.73% chance none of the five chose vanilla)