Answer:
If it start spending more or taxing less.
Explanation:
Expansionary fiscal policy is, simply put, when a government starts spending more, or taxing less. In the U.S. today, expansionary fiscal policy is typically associated with an expanding deficit and national debt, but this policy doesn't necessarily equate to these two hot political topics. A government can have a budget surplus and still use this policy. The key is that it just spends more or taxes less, regardless of its budgetary surplus or deficit.
Answer:
Yes and no in a way the Constitution kinda ensured there rights as people. But did not directly state it that what when the bill of rights came to play. And if the continues the confederal government we would have an anarchy because the government would collapsed decades ago. Yes some might have could have took it over and not people might not have there rights.
Explanation:
<span>The Second Continental Congress adopted the U.S. Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. It met from May 1775 to March 1781 and served as the de facto national government of the American colonies during the Revolutionary War</span>
Answer:
Most executive agreements have been made pursuant to a treaty or to an act of Congress. Sometimes, however, presidents have concluded executive agreements to achieve purposes that would not command the support of two-thirds of the Senate. ... The use of executive agreements increased significantly after 1939.
plz mark as brainliest :DD
For: Clay believed it would help foster economic growth along with stability. This would also fund the roads and canals, federally.
Against: Jackson believed that it was unconstitutional to do so. He did not believe it was possible to find so much and grow.
