The philosophy discussed above is called enabling.
Enabling is providing workers with the education and tools they need to make decisions. Companies can empower workers by enabling them with the knowledge to make decisions that will benefit the company and satisfy the customers in the long run. This will lead to increase in profitability.
FDIC monitor banks by analyzing Call Report data and examination findings relative to the emerging trends.
The FDIC monitor banks to ensure that they are operating within the bounds of the law and are not engaging in any illegal or unsafe practices. They also work to ensure that banks are providing customers with the best possible service and are protecting their deposits
If the FDIC finds that a bank is not meeting these standards, they will take action to correct the situation. As a result, the FDIC has a better understanding of the risks that banks face and is better equipped to protect consumers from financial fraud.
To know more about banks, click here.
brainly.com/question/14042269
#SPJ4
Answer: A. It has a competitive advantage in the industry
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that the average cost of production for a bottle of water in the industry is 0.20 cents while its average price is 0.50 cents and that Water Inc. manufactures the same product for 0.10 cents while its average price is 0.40 cents.
The scenario shows that Water Inc has a competitive advantage in the industry. This is seen as the bottle of water is produced at a cheaper cost wen compared to its rivals.
Answer:
Morally, how about we start with business morals. Extensively business morals spin around progressively the estimation of the business to investors or partners (contingent upon the type of private enterprise). In the event that redistributing work diminishes costs and converts into expanded benefits for the organization, that is sufficient to consider it in accordance with the all-encompassing order of the business whether or not there is a decrease in cost for the buyer.
Is it morally wrong to use innovative advances to build creation productivity when request in a market is generally inelastic? Cultivating used to be 40% of American employments. Presently it's generally 2% but then out creation has developed.
Long haul the pulverization of a class of business is regularly counterbalanced by the formation of another classification the requires increasingly psychological assets. Actually, whole new enterprises can be made. So it is additionally not so much exact to restrict your view to simply the individuals who are dislodged from their occupations. It is completely conceivable that the net impact on the economy is sure.
Be that as it may, again morals are increasingly emotional and have to do with the type of private enterprise to which one buys in, political way of thinking, and perspective on social duty of business.
Based on the amount covered and the amount withdrawn, we can calculate that Boba's annual health insurance premium is<u> $6,256.88</u>
First find the total amount withheld from Boba in a year:
= 185.30 x 26
= $4,817.80
Boba's employer covers 23% of his insurance so the amount withdrawn is 77% of the insurance.
The annual insurance is therefore:
<em>= Boba's share / Percentage paid by Boba</em>
= 4,817.80 / 77%
= $6,256.88
In conclusion, the annual premium is $6,256.88
<em>Find out more about </em><em>insurance premiums </em><em>at brainly.com/question/3757928. </em>