, in its Dred Scott decision<span>, the Supreme Court ruled that Mr. </span>Scott<span>, a </span>slave<span> who had spent part of his life in non-</span>slave<span> territory, </span>could not<span> sue for his freedom in a federal court because, as the March 7 New York Times summarized, “Negroes, whether </span>slaves<span> or free, that is, men of the African race,</span>
Kampala is the capital city of Uganda
I think it was Actus Reus which had to do with “guilty act” and “guilty mind” when dealing with a crime committed.
Answer:
Option E
Explanation:
In simple words, the above case relates to the situation of lack of evidence. For proving an alleged criminal to be the culprit the law requires a full hard core proof after no further questioning regarding guilt of the culprit could be done.
In this case, eye witnesses or video camera recording could have been an aid fr Patty but as she had not presented anything to the court she can do nothing.
None of them every state has bad or criminals
