Answer:
Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.
At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:
the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents
attributing false conclusions to books and sources
manipulating statistical data
deliberately mis-translating texts
This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.
Answer:the eight members of the clergy who wrote “call for unity” supported the civil rights movement. They believed in the idea of equality for all Americans. However they thought that equal rights should be pursued only through the courts and legal methods. Martian Luther King Jr. and other civil rights activists believed that it was necessary to hold demonstrations, such as sit-ins and marches, to put pressure on governments and call attention to issues. Even though these methods were technically against the law, activists argued that these laws were immoral. Their tactics helped bring about important change
Explanation:
Sample answer from edmentum yw!
Pacific Command and now United States Central Command, it's impossible to make this guy as he likes to say " nervous". The United States Central Command is a theater-level Unified Combatant Command of the U.S. Department of Defense, established in 1983, taking over the 1980 Rapid Deployment Joint Task Force responsibilities. United States Pacific Command is a unified combatant command of the United States armed forces responsible for the Indo-Asia-Pacific region. It is the oldest and largest of the unified combatant commands.
The passage of the GI Bill changed American cities and towns in that it gave returning veterans more economic opportunities, which allowed them to leave the cities.
<span><span>
</span></span>
