Answer:
Option C. It provided individual incentives; now it provides organizational incentives.
Explanation:
The reason is that incentives were previously assessed on the individual performance and now changing it to stock option reflects that if the whole of the organization will perform well then all of them will benefit from the increase in the value of the company shares which benefits employee, organization and the shareholders as well.
Answer:
unsought
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that this is an example of an unsought product. This term refers to a product in which an individual does not care much about or is even interested in purchasing. Which in this situation Megan has not given much thought into life insurance and is not looking to purchase it, but is aware of it due to the insurance agent's call.
Answer:
a) decrease the quantity demanded
Explanation:
According to the law of demand, an increase in the price of a good reduces the quantity demanded for that good.
Answer:
Employment of low wage workers will decrease and which in turn increase the unemployment.
Explanation:
Perfectly competitive labor market, is the one which is described as the composite of many firms or companies that are in the competition for the workers. The firms will not be in power to set the wages for the workers, the market also determines the competitive wage.
But if this is a low wage labor and on that the government establish or form the minimum wage then it will result in the employment of the low wage workers will decrease and the consequence of which is increase in the unemployment.
Note: Options are missing so providing the direct answer
Answer:
The correct answer is C. This claim is most likely based on the right to substantive due process.
Explanation:
Substantive due process is a means by which the government's ability to interfere with the fundamental rights of individuals is limited. In this case, the fundamental right violated is that of freedom of expression, guaranteed by the First Amendment. Thus, since it is a right with constitutional protection, the government cannot curtail its operation without the due legal process necessary for this purpose.
