Answer:
Sometimes our justice system can really surprise us. How can a person sue another individual based on arguments that are known to be false? Shouldn't the courts just say no to this kind of lawsuits?
It's plain common sense that the court would dictate that the agreement should be annulled or rescinded based on the mother's fraud attempt or maybe mutual mistake between Michael Jordan and her. Even if they were both convinced that he was the father, after it was proven that he wasn't, the court shouldn't have even wasted its time (and taxpayers money) with this case.
Answer:
The answer is: E) modified rebuy
Explanation:
A modified rebuy happens when a company (or an individual consumer) will buy a product or service which it has already purchased in the past. But now the company wants to change either the supplier, the product's specifications or the terms of the sale.
In this case, the store owner had already bought advertising tools before, but not this type.
Answer:
f(x) = -1.25x + 64 I hope this helps :)
Explanation:
total amount of money: $80
He spent $16 for the entrance of the fair and food.
80-(4+12) = 64
After that you subtract $1.25 per ride = -1.25x
Then it gives the function:
f(x) = -1.25x + 64
Answer:b. A career is a series of steps or accomplishments working towards a lifelong ambition or goal.
Explanation:
Answer:
B) False
Explanation:
In a command economy, the government makes the fundamental economic choices such as what to produce and how to produce output.
The government also owns means of production.
I hope my answer helps you
