The correct answer is A. reliable.
The writer was 'an authoritative source' because of her degrees, guest appearances, etc. Thus, she was a source you could rely on, she was reliable, given that she had experience to back her ideas up. Therefore A is the only correct answer.
Firstly, how could someone get excited about another saying there god is fake. It just made me giggle a little
Next, it would be the hymns. The bringing together of the community was a huge part of Things Fall Apart. God and stuff is all good and that. But they already had that. They had multiple gods. They had ways of getting around that were reliable for them. But the hymns brought them together like their wrestling tradition, it was a coaxing. A way for the missionaries to "incorporate" their traditions into the Christian way and make Christianity look appealing to the people of Mbanta.
I honestly love this book and all it shows from the perspective of the oppressed and colonized people, who were oppressed in their own country.
I think the answer would be B
Answer:
In a sentence, WHO and WHOM have different syntactic functions.
Explanation:
WHO
- WHO can be used as the subject of a sentence. For example, "who is your brother?"
- WHO can be replaced by he or she.
WHOM
- WHOM is used as the object of the verb or object of a preposition as in "who is helping whom?" or "I know the person to whom the letter was addressed" respectively.
- WHOM can be replaced by him or her.
