1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MakcuM [25]
3 years ago
15

The fourth amendment implies privacy because it protects the right?

History
2 answers:
suter [353]3 years ago
7 0

The fourth amendment implies privacy because it protects the rights of the citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Further Explanation:

The fourth amendment is one of the ten amendments listed in the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is a critical part of the US Constitution.

Specifically, the fourth amendment protects citizens against unreasonable search and seizures. This prevents government officials or law enforcement agencies from being able to search someone's belong without:

A) Reasonable suspicion

B) A warrant

Any case where a government official or law enforcement agency violates a citizens right to privacy by searching their home/property without reasonable suspicion or a warrant, the case will be thrown out. This amendment is critically in ensuring that the government does not abuse its power or target specific groups of citizens within American society.

Learn More:

Explanation of the purpose of the Bill of Rights- brainly.com/question/1217187

Key Details:

Topic: American History, Law, American Government

Grade Level: 7-12

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, Bill of Rights, American government, unreasonable search and seizures

Klio2033 [76]3 years ago
5 0

The United States Constitution defends personal solitude, and all citizen's liberty to be autonomous of extravagant administration interruption into their individual affairs, relationships, institutions, and resources either by the policemen impediments to prevent the residents on the road, obstructions, or searches of residences and corporations.

Further Explanation:

In the felonious law department, Fourth Amendment "search and seizure" protections continue to: A law implementation officer's environmental perception or disruption of a person, employing a suspension and Police explorations of accommodations and items in which a person has an authorized expectation of secrecy such as clothes, wallet, baggage, transportation, house, residence, hotel room, and place of the profession, to name a few instances.

The Fourth Amendment implements protection to residents during searches and arrests and restricts illegally confiscated items from being used as proof in illegal cases. The degree of stability possible in an appropriate case depends on the character of the impediment or arrest, the components of the place examined, and the conditions under which the search occurs.

Possible situations involving the Fourth Amendment, and law enforcement's legal responsibility to preserve Fourth Amendment rights in those situations, are too diverse to incorporate.

However, in most situations a police administrator may not examine or seize a person or his or her estate if the officer does not have:

  • A legitimate search authorization;
  • A legitimate apprehension authorization; or
  • Confidence emanating to the level of "probable cause" that a person has commissioned a felony.

Learn more:

1. An example of due process of law as guaranteed by the fifth amendment. brainly.com/question/2039621

2. Why is the 17th amendment significant?  brainly.com/question/1810100

Answer details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: NA

Keywords:

Law, fourth amendment , search and seizure , situation , police administration , probable cause , authorization , legitimate , expectation , secrecy, felony.

You might be interested in
Asserts that men an women are equal ?
torisob [31]

Answer:yes

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
During World War II, the Nazis devised a plan to get rid of all Jews in Europe by killing them. This was known as the "final sol
ICE Princess25 [194]
Simple...

The camps were liberated by Allied forces near the end of the war.

If you remember, this is known as the Holocaust. What the Nazi's did to the Jew was a violation of their human rights and will always go down in history as something to never be forgotten. The way they were treated is unspeakable, brash, cruel, despicable and once the world had found out what the Nazi's were doing; there was a huge uproar. May this never be forgotten.



5 0
3 years ago
Why was texas a source of conflict between the united states and mexico
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:There was several causes of the conflict between American settlers and Mexico.

Explanation:

Mexico feared that they would lose Texas to the United States, so they started enforcing laws that had been ignored. Fighting at the Alamo inspired Texans to win their independence because it fueled rage of Texas.

5 0
3 years ago
Typically, what percentage of eligible Americans votes in national elections?
kirill [66]

The correct answer is D. 70% or below

Explanation:

The term national elections refer to mainly the elections of the president and vice president of the U.S. that take place every four years and in which citizens from all states of the United States are asked to vote, this date usually coincides with other federal or local elections. Even though this election system has been used for many years it has been widely criticized, one of the reason for this is the low percentage of citizens that vote in national elections as this can imply this system is not really democratic as the opinion of the majority of U.S. citizens is not reflected on the elections, in this way during the elections of 2004 the percentage of eligible population that voted was 60.1%,and in in 2008 this percentage was 61.4%, which was the highest percentage since 1968 which suggest in most election the percentage has been near to 70% or under 70%. Thus, the percentage of eligible Americans that vote on national elections is around 70% or below.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is more important the robust of public domain or the well being of private interests?
Darya [45]

Answer:

The well being of private citizens is more important.

Explanation:

The public domain has as its  primary duty the defense of the interests of civil society. If the state is better organized, more robust, it can help society to flourish. However, the well being of the state is subservient to the wellbeing of each citizen, private interests. Furthermore, civil society is the source of governance insofar as i) government officials are elected from civil society and ii) public policy serves the private interests of the people. So in a society it is indispensable to have a more robust state and a better- served civil society, keeping in mind the order of importance.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Thre French and Indian War:<br><br> Describe how the treaty affected France.
    13·1 answer
  • Which element has two valence electrons? lithium (Li) argon (Ar) calcium (Ca) fluorine (F)
    8·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast NATO and the Warsaw Pact
    14·1 answer
  • Mollusks like clams and snails have a heart that pumps through open ended vessels.
    12·1 answer
  • When did the prairie schooner being to be used for travel ?A 1860 B 1850 C 1830 D 1840
    15·1 answer
  • Match the term with its description:
    11·1 answer
  • What Countries Were Given To Hitler To Appease Him?
    15·1 answer
  • plz help ASAP if ur good with history and lerned about perl habor!! you dot have to answer all of them
    12·1 answer
  • HELP HELP HELP
    9·1 answer
  • Which was an effect of the Cuban Revolution on the relationship between Cuba and the United States?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!