Answer:
<h2>In the context of Consumer Theory or Indifference Curve involving two goods,the opportunity of any one good is computed by how much of the other good is foregone or sacrificed to purchase one more unit of that particular good.</h2>
Explanation:
- In this instance,when Bill's diner consumes 35 burgers and 25 hotdogs,its opportunity cost of additional hot dog=
.Therefore,initially Bill diner's opportunity cost of an additional hot dog is 1.4 units of burger.
- Now,when Bill's diner chooses to consume a combination of 25 burgers and 65 hot dogs,its opportunity cost of additional hot dogs=
approximately.Hence,Bill's diner is willing to sacrifice approximately 0.385 units of burger to consume an additional unit of hot dog. - Now,due to the change in consumption combination,the change in opportunity cost of additional hot dog=
units of burger.Notice,that here the opportunity cost of additional hot dog decreased from 1.4 units of burger to 0.385 units of burger as Bill's diner changed the consumption combination of both burgers and hot dogs.
Answer: 0.1282
Explanation:
Total number of possible outcome( total candidates) = 13
Total number of men = 13 - 8 = 5
Total number of women = 8
Number of candidates to be selected = 2
Find the probability that both are men :
Probability of 1st candidate being a male = required outcome ÷ total possible outcome = 5/13
Probability of second candidate being a male, means we now have 4 men left and a total of 12 = 4/12
Therefore, P = (5/13) × (4/12)
P = (5/13) ×(1/3) = 5/39 = 0.1282
Answer:
-3 million dollars
Explanation:
we have EVA = economic value added
to ge the EVA, we use this formula :
(operating return on the assets - cost of the total capital) multiplied by the total assets
total assets = 100 million
operating return = 12 percent
cost of capital = 15 percent
the EVA = 12% - 15% * 100000000
= -0.03 * 100000000
= -3,000,000 dollars
b. The loss of the value of the shareholder is happening even though the firm is earning ROI that is more than the average firm in the industry.
Answer:
Option D: Burr's belief that Hamilton had slandered him.
Explanation:
The duel stemmed from a history of animosity between both men over the years. The existing personal animosity and personal bitterness between both individuals came to a head in the run-up to the governorship election in New-York in 1804.
The Albany Registrar published a letter sent from Charles Cooper to senator Philip Schuyler which referenced a statement made by General Hamilton describing Colonel Burr as being a dangerous and despicable human being incapable of running a government.
The ensuing duel was as a result of this defamation.
