1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mihalych1998 [28]
4 years ago
12

In which system of gonvernment would states function independently of each other?

Law
2 answers:
Ksenya-84 [330]4 years ago
6 0
I believe it would be confederal system, i believe so...
Anna007 [38]4 years ago
3 0
Confederal, would be a good answer.
You might be interested in
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Minors are generally held liable on a quasi-contract basis for the reasonable value of necessaries provided to them.
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At which stage in the pretrial process can the prosecution drop some of the charges against the defendant?
Nataly [62]

Answer:  Plea Bargain If a defendant is charged with multiple offenses, he or she can sometimes plead guilty to one of the offenses, and the prosecution will agree to drop the other charges.

Explanation:

i dont have one

7 0
3 years ago
4.Your hospital attorney objects to the subpoena of the peer review committee materials, citing state law that protects peer rev
german

Answer:

Check explanation.

Explanation:

When someone or an individual who is a patient and as also the person is a plaintiff in the law court, there is something concerning the patient (who is also the plaintiff) has which prevent the release of the information concerning the peer review records in law court.

And this kind of privilege is backed up by the law of the state courts. Apart from the fact that it has the ability of refusing to release such information to the law court, the information can also not be released during any sort of trial.

6 0
3 years ago
A Law Enforcement agency has to concern themselves with _____________________ when administering justice?
Masteriza [31]
I believe that the answer is Jurisdiction
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • List ten word that are associated with<br>advertising​
    14·1 answer
  • The courts sometimes will reform contracts when they determine that there are inconsistencies in the contract or that the contra
    13·1 answer
  • Plzz answer my question its urgent plzz
    11·1 answer
  • Cars are only as safe as their driver, so _____ is your best bet to lower your risk.
    11·2 answers
  • What is the most important part of the trial proceedings? Why?
    13·1 answer
  • Question 3 (2 points)
    14·1 answer
  • Interpreting Political Cartoons 1. Describe what is happening in the cartoon. 2. Hitler had absolute authority in Nazi Germany.
    8·1 answer
  • In Parker's lawsuit against Mark, the jury returns a verdict in Mark's favor. Shortly thereafter, the judge learns that Mark had
    6·1 answer
  • Benny was arrested by New York Police and charged with the armed robbery of a taxicab driver. While Benny was in jail waiting fo
    10·1 answer
  • Bài toán IQ tính chiều cao cái bàn? , biết: Nếu con mèo ở trên cái bàn, còn rùa ở dưới cái bàn thì khoảng cách 2 con vật là 170
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!