Because the armbands were deemed "Pure Speech," the Supreme Court ruled that their suspension is unconstitutional. The armbands had no negative effects on academic performance.
When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional matter, that decision is essentially definitive; only the constitutional amendment process or a subsequent judgment by the Court may overturn the Court's rulings. However, fresh legislative action may be done in response to the Court's interpretation of legislation.
Legislation, method, or action is unconstitutional if it directly contravenes the constitution. Unless the nation in issue has a system in place for challenging laws as being unconstitutional, all others are regarded as constitutional.
To learn more about Supreme Court
brainly.com/question/10739091
#SPJ4
Answer:
legislative, executive and judicial. The Executive Branch consists of the President, his or her advisors and various departments and agencies.
Explanation:
Answer:
The United States first amendment carried more protection and less restriction in its implementation and here is why.
The edict of the United States does not qualify the application of the clause granting freedom of expression. That of the United Kingdom does. In doing so, it ensures that Freedom of Expression is used appropriately in that it must be targeted at the common good and the well being of the state.
It states, for instance, that
<em>"Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:
</em>
- <em>
protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state) or public safety
</em>
- <em>prevent disorder or crime
</em>
- <em>protect health or morals
</em>
- <em>protect the rights and reputations of other people
</em>
- <em>prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence
</em>
- <em>maintain the authority and impartiality of judges"</em>
Cheers!
