Accounting or accountancy is the measurement, processing, and communication of financial and non financial information about economic entities such as businesses and corporations.
Answer:
$1476.71
Explanation:
Formula = pmt(((1+r)^n)-1)/I
I = nominal interest rate
Pmt = dollar amount
r = interest rate
N = number of period
4930 = pmt(((1 +0.109)^3)-1)/0.109
4930 = pmt(1.109^3)-1/0.109
4930 = pmt(1.3639-1)/0.109
4930 = pmt(0.3638/0.109)
4930 = pmt3.3385
Pmt = 4930/3 3385
= $1476.71
Richard miller would have to save $1476.71
Answer:Please refer to Explanation
Explanation:
Cross Price Elasticity of Demand is a very useful tool in Economics to ascertain if goods are compliments or Substitutes.
Cross Price Elasticity of Demand (CPSD) measures the change in demand in one good due to a change in price is the other good.
If the CPSD is negative then the goods are Compliments meaning that they are used together which is why when the price of one good goes down, the demand of the compliment goes up because more of the original good will be bought due to the lower price.
If the CPSD is Positive, it means that they are Substitutes and a Decrease in price in one good leads to a decrease in demand for the other good because people will demand less of it and switch to the former (now cheaper) good.
The formula is,
= % change in Quantity Demanded of Product A /% change in Price of Product B
a. Splishy splashies and Flopsicles
CPSD = -18%/-1%
= 18%
The CPSD for both these products is 18% which is a positive figure. This means that they are Substitutes and <u>should not be marketed together. </u>
b. Splishy Splashies and Flopsicles
CPSD = 3%/-1%
= -3%
With the CPSD being a negative figure here, these goods are Compliments.
Splishy Splashies and Flopsicles <u>should be Marketed together</u> as they compliment each other.
Answer:
No, their economic cost of enrolling in the business program is not the same for both,
Explanation:
The explicit costs of going back to college are the same for Walter and Jesse, e.g. they might be $20,000 per year, or even $30,000 doesn't matter for this analysis. But Walter is currently working as a teacher and that means taht if he decides to go to college, his implicit costs will include the forgone salary as a teacher which is $50,000 per year. Implicit costs are opportunity costs, i.e. additional costs or benefits lost from choosing one activity or investment instead of another alternative.
Since Jesse is not working, whether she goes back to college or not will not affect her income, it will still be $0, but if Walter goes back to college he will lose his salary.
Answer:
Explanation:
This is a question about allocation based on how much the street frontage will be valued in future. That value will then be allocated to the joint cost to see how much to apportion to Street Frontage now.
The total value of the Street Frontage after development is,
= 125 lots * $70,000
= $8,750,000
The total value of Golf lots are,
= 100 lots * $100,000
= $10,000,000
Adding them up,
= 10,000,000 + 8,750,000
= $18,750,000
This is the total amount of the company could make and therefore the lot's value.
Company incurred the following costs.
= 1,850,000 * 1,450,000
= $3,300,000
The amount of joint costs to be allocated to Street Frontage will be,
= 8,750,000/ 18,750,000 * 3,300,000
= $1,540,000
The amount to allocate to Street Frontage based on the total value of the lot is $1,540,000.