Answer:
E. Debit Cash $4,000; credit Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par Value, Preferred Stock $1,900, credit Preferred Stock $2,100.
Explanation:
Journal Entry for Issuance of 70 shares of $30 par value preferred stock for $4,000 is -
Cash Debited - $4,000
Paid in Capital in excess of Par value Credited - $1,900
Preferred Stock (70 shares × $30 each) Credited - $2,100
The correct option is - E. Debit Cash $4,000; credit Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par Value, Preferred Stock $1,900, credit Preferred Stock $2,100.
Answer:
1. As you have to spend more Yens for 1 USD at future date, it means that Yen is selling at discount in the forward market relative to the US Dollar.
2. The spot exchange rate is ¥132.78 per dollar, hence, total dollars Purple Panda Importers will receive today is ¥625 million/¥132.78 = $4.71 million
3. Purple Panda Importers would get more dollars if the Japanese firm paid off its account <u>today</u>.That is, he will get more money if the account is paid today.
The answer to the first unknown is the "COST SIDE" while the answer to the second unknown in the problem is "PRODUCTION AND MARKETING COST". Hence, with a cost-oriented pricing strategy used and implemented by many companies, a price setter stresses the COST SIDE of the pricing problem and the price is set by looking at the PRODUCTION and MARKETING COST.
Answer:
An investment with more liquidity would be ideal for someone who knows they will nee cash in the near future.
Explanation:
More liquid assets are those that can be turn into cash more quickly than those that less liquid assets.
If one is thinking about investing in a liquid asset, surely is because it will need the cash in the short run. On the contrary, we could invest in other financial instruments less liquid (typically those who offer higher yields and have longer terms), because we are not going to need the money for the moment, and we want to take advantage of that to get a higher yields.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Proposed bargain or deal is supportive of the business visionaries instead of the financial backer(investor) since all the capital is coming from the financial backer and the investor will be receiving just only 25% for the bargain or deal while he faces all the challenges posed or loss of capital. The business visionaries are not placing in any of their own personal capital but only their idea. They likewise have a bigger say in the administration of the business and the financial backer has no power over the choice since he conveys just 25% votes. Consequently, it's not a good bargain or deal for the financial backer considering the risk-reward ratio.
The counter-offer will include raising a proposed equity percent rate to half (i.e 50%). In addition to that, the financial backer needs to demand another seat on the board with the goal that they have equivalent authority over the administration and its choices. The most reduced the financial backer can go down is equity of 40% stake.
