When a blue ocean strategy fails, a company lacks both a distinct point of uniqueness and a distinct cost-leadership profile. The phrase <u>"stuck in the middle"</u> describes this circumstance.
<h3><u>What does "Blue Ocean Strategy" entail?</u></h3>
Blue Ocean Strategy is applicable to all industries and types of businesses. It is not exclusive to a single company. In the current business climate, the majority of businesses compete fiercely for market share. The viability of a company's operations is always a possibility when the product is subject to pricing pressure.
This circumstance typically arises when the company is competing in a crowded market, also referred to as a "Red Ocean." Businesses aim to locate verticals or new company opportunities where they can enjoy uncontested market share or a "Blue Ocean" where there is little possibility for growth. There is a "blue ocean" when there is the potential for larger profitability despite existing or insignificant competition.
<u></u>
Learn more about cost leadership with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14975894
#SPJ4
<u></u>
Answer:
Split-half Method.
Explanation:
Split half test is the method to assess the reliability of internal consistency.
Split-Half method is a reliability test in which to gain insight about a single knowledge, the test is divided into two parts. Then two groups of students or people are required to participate in the test at the same time. The scores of both the groups are assessed. A test that have high correlation suggests the reliability and will reveal how well or poorly the students will perform in the test.
<u>In the given case, Chan has divided the test questions into five questions each for two groups, to check the reliability of instrument. The results of both the test are assessed with the hope that they have similar results. This is the method of testing reliability with the split-half method</u>.
So, the correct answer is split-half method.
Answer:
he commissioned the construction of Shimenno-Ji
Explanation:
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
