Answer:
The rejection by the third job
Explanation:
Resumes
This is simply known as the normal means or method of an introduction to potential (assumed) employer. it containsmore relevant/more accurate information about the person and it is resume used as a basis for deciding which candidates to investigate further. The resume of candidates shows if identifies candidates meeting requirements.
There are various steps taken by the selection process in every organizations during employment exercise. They includes
1. Screening applications and resumes
2. Testing and reviewing work samples
3. Interviewing candidates
4. Checking references and background
5. Lastly, making a selection
The third one will be the most painful one to her as she has put more work into it than the rest.
Answer:
hello below is the missing diagram needed for the question
answer : point B
Explanation:
when there is a technological innovation that increases the demand for investment and goods the real interest rate,savings and investment will take a positive outlook i.e take a shift to the right , this is due to the increase in investment and a corresponding increase in demand by consumers
Technological innovation are very vital for the expansion of production by companies and firms who provide either goods or services
Answer: Raises the CPI and reduces real income.
Explanation:
Inflation is a sustained rise in the general price level of the goods and services in an economy during a particular period. It is usually expressed as a percentage. Inflation leads to a reduction in the purchasing power of a country's currency.
Real income reduces because a rise in the price level with nominal income constant reduces the purchasing power of money. People holding real assets are better off than people who are holding cash.
Answer:
For the Economist A the spending multiplier is = 8, the tax multiplier = 4, the increase in spending is = $4 billion, the tax cut is = $8 billion.
For the Economist B, the spending multiplier is =4, the tax multiplier = 2, the increase in spending is = $8 billion, the tax cut is = $16 billion.
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
(1)The Economist A
The Spending multiplier = 8
In closing the output gap of $32 billion, required increase in spending = $32 billion / 8 = $4 billion
Thus,
The tax multiplier = 4
To close output gap of $32 billion, required decrease in tax = $32 billion / 4 = $8 billion
(2)The Economist B
Now,
The spending multiplier = 4
To close output gap of $32 billion, required increase in spending = $32 billion / 4 = $8 billion
So,
Tax multiplier = 2
To close output gap of $32 billion, required decrease in tax = $32 billion / 2 = $16 billion
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.