The performance management approach that uses job performance evaluations to identify a company's best, average, and worst performing employees, using person-to-person comparisons, is known as "forced ranking".
<h3>What is forced ranking?</h3>
The contentious practice of "forced ranking," which grades employees against one another rather than against performance standards, is very popular in corporate America.
The problem with forced ranking are-
- This can lead to a lack of motivation and disengagement among employees as well as unneeded internal competition that can harm collaboration, creativity, and innovation and divert attention from market competition.
- Although contentious, forced ranking systems are legal. Employers who choose to take action based on those rankings, however, run a number of legal dangers.
The forced rankings beneficial from an employee perspective, here are reasons-
- This system teaches a manager how to assess employees objectively with the right management training.
- When the management system needs to be improved or formalised, forced rankings are advantageous.
- An essential component of business is analysing trends and developments.
To know more about example of forced ranking, here
brainly.com/question/6626507
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is: the cost of it.
Explanation:
To begin with, knowing that planning, organizating, controling and directing are the basis of an structured company in order to achieve efficiently those there is a cost that has to be done, therefore that the major drawback of becoming more structured in the company is the cost of doing it, due to the fact that creating documents and teaching every one how to use it and more, the costs of the company will increase as well as the company will become more structured.
Answer: $51,000
Explanation:
Thirty-five percent of the sales on account are collected in the month of sale, 45% in the month following sale, and the remainder are collected in the second month following sale.
In March therefore, the cashflow will consist of;
35% of March sales
45% of February sales
20% of January sales
= (35% * 40,000) + (45% * 60,000) + (20% * 50,000)
= 14,000 + 27,000 + 10,000
= $51,000
A customer who is long 1 OEX may 315 call exercises the contract on this day. the customer will receive $58.00. Option A
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is called exercises?</h3>
Generally, If you possess a call option and the current stock price is greater than the strike price, it makes financial sense for you to execute your call option at this time.
You are able to make a profit by purchasing the stock at a lower price so that you can either instantly resell it to the market at a higher price or keep it for the long term.
In conclusion, On this day, a client who is long 1 OEX and has a 315 call option on the contract may execute it. The total amount that the client will get is $58.00. Alternative A
Read more about call exercises
brainly.com/question/14763313
#SPJ1
Answer:
They should be reported in 2 different parts, first under current liabilities as:
Then under long term liabilities:
- Notes payable expected to be refinanced $1,044,000
Explanation:
the total short term notes payable on December 31 = $1,313,000
- $1,044,000 were paid off by issuing common stocks, so that portion of the debt must be reported as notes payable expected to be refinanced (or refinanced debt)
- the remaining $269,000 which were paid using cash reserves must be reported as current notes payable
