Answer:
A) A test with a high cost may also be of high value.
Explanation:
A test's cost add up to the time spent in preparing that test. S much time might have really been spent on it like researching, sitting, time spent, revaluation of the test, as well as other contributions made for the execution of that test. The value of the test can be evaluated to the resources spent for the test. When a test has a high cost, it may also have a high value depending on some variables relating to both the cost of the test as well as its value. Also, every individual's primary objective is usually cost minimization and profit maximization in every thing he does irrespective of type or structure.
Answer:
the general welfare will be the sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus.
Explanation:
The consumer and producer surplus assessment serves to measure the overall efficiency of the market, which in turn is associated with overall well-being. An efficient market is one in which both consumers and producers have the incentive to negotiate and effect trade.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the amount he or she is willing to pay and how much he or she actually pays for the product. This surplus is positive when the amount paid is less than the amount for which the consumer would be willing to pay.
Similarly, the producer's surplus is the difference between the market price and the price at which the seller is willing to produce and sell. When the producer's surplus is positive, it means that he sells the product for a price higher than the minimum value that would stimulate him to produce.
Thus, the general welfare will be the sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus.
Answer:
I thing it is D????????????????????/
Explanation:
Answer:
Res ipsa loquitur
Explanation:
_____ is a tort in which the presumption of negligence arises because the defendant was in exclusive control of the situation, and the plaintiff would not have suffered injury but for someone's negligence.
Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine in law that one can presume the negligence of a defendant when the facts are glaring.The doctrine has primarily required that a defendant have exclusive power over the occurrence of an injury. negligence could result from
1. an actual causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the resulting harm; 2 a duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff; 3 a breach of that duty;
Answer:
3 is the correct answer, financial managers are in charge of all of the companies finances
Explanation:
