Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = (3/2)ˣ
g(x) = (2/3)ˣ
These are examples of exponential equations:
y = a bˣ
If b > 1, the equation is exponential growth.
If 0 < b < 1, the equation is exponential decay.
So f(x) is an example of exponential growth, and g(x) is an example of exponential decay.
Also, 2/3 is the inverse of 3/2, so:
g(x) = (3/2)^(-x)
So more specifically, f(x) and g(x) are reflections of each other across the y-axis.
Answer:
B.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the population, in this case, weights of golden retriever dogs, follows a normal distribution, then the sample will too, even if the sample size is lower than 30. You only have to worry about the sample size being too small when a problem doesn't explicitly say the distribution from which the samples are drawn is normally distributed.
Based on the data, the most likely correlation coefficient would be -1.
The slope between 20 and 30 days is -1, and it represents the change in the surface area of the lake per day.
The data represents correlation, not causation.
Since the data would form a perfectly straight line through the points, the correlation coefficient would be -1 for a perfect decreasing fit.
To find the slope, find the change in the surface area between those days, the change in the days, and write it as surface area/days: 80-90=-10; 30-20=10; -10/10=-1
This is not causation because there could be lurking variables we cannot see.
I assume what you mean by this question is an equation like this:
1 + 2 x 3 + 4
Or,
3 x 4 + 6 /div 5
--
What you'd do:
1+2 x 3+4 First, add either 1+2 or 3+4 which is 3 & 7. then, youd multiply your answers as, 3 x 7 which is, 21.
--
Please ask if you have any questions
Probably be what if the teacher had a number -10
