Answer:
It is a winning strategy.
Explanation:
As a result of joint venture, after all the ups and downs, the company is in a strong financial position, as company is producing good profits. Also the company has great market position.
Once a great market position, the influence is spread in the market.
Further, in the given instance the company has failed to acquire the manufacturing company individually, but with joint venture, the company has now established connections not only in pharma sector but also in automobiles.
These things affect the company's position and then influence the market, attracting more customers for the product, and more investors for investment.
Therefore, it is a winning strategy.
Answer:
A. pivot rightward (pivot out) along the horizontal axis
Explanation:
Tea and coffee represent substitute goods. If price of a good increases, this causes an increase in quantity demanded of it's substitute.
In the given case, quantity demanded of tea is measured on horizontal axis while quantity demanded of coffee is measured on vertical axis. The budget constraint for tea and coffee shows different combinations of quantity of tea and coffee demanded within a fixed expenditure.
When price of coffee increases, within the same budget constraint, the quantity demanded of tea shall rise.
This would lead to the budget constraint to pivot rightward (pivot out) along the horizontal axis.
Answer:
When you talking about this
Explanation:
Sussss but among sus hehhehehehehe loool
Answer:
Most of these firms had audit committees that met at least four times a year.
Explanation:
COSO stands for Committee of Sponsoring Organization, which is an organization that is dedicated to offering the thought of guidance as well as leadership on the fraud deterrence, internal control and management of enterprise risk.
From the findings which is not found as fraud is that the most of the firms or businesses had committees of audit which met at least 4 times a year.
The marginal utility of the third Pepsi is 8 units of utility
Explanation:
Marginal utility attempts to measure the additionally fulfilled use of extra products or services by a customer.
Economists use the idea of marginal demand to assess how much a individual good is likely to pay.
The complete utility of that first two Pepsi is equal to 30(= 18 + 12).
Thus, the marginal value of the third Pepsi is equal to 8 (= 38-30).