1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxMikexx [17]
3 years ago
14

Choose any two countries in the world, and briefly discuss the evolution of the government of these countries.

Social Studies
1 answer:
victus00 [196]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is, let’s take the cases of Mexico and Argentina.

Mexico has had a major change of power in the presidency in the last elections of 2018, with the victory of a left-sided party called MORENA. The Revolutionary Party (PRI) governed the country for 70 years. It lost the presidency for the first time in 2000 to the right-sided party called National Action (PAN). In 2012, and due to the bad conditions of the country, official national party PRI won again and had 6 disastrous years that made people angry. Andres Manuel Lopez from MORENA left-sided party won the elections in 2018 with a record-setting 53% of the votes.  

The case of Argentina is more critical. The economic situation is very poor and people is getting angry. Since 1991 that the Argentina peso pegged the dollar, things have been worse. President Carlos Menem had two terms both the economic conditions did not improve. The next presidents, Fernando de la Rua and Nestor Kirchner couldn’t do so much and the economy stayed in recession. In a controversial decision, Cristina Kirchnner, wife of former president Nestor, won the election and at the end of her tenure, she was accused of mismanaging of national resources. Mauricio Macri is the actual President and has taken controversial measures that had reduced the money in people’s pockets.  


You might be interested in
Suppose there is a policy debate over imposing trade restrictions on imported semiconductors in the United States. A political p
jolli1 [7]

Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.

Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.

This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.

The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In your opinion, can a leader maintain a persona friendship with some members of his or her work group or team without creating
Nutka1998 [239]
<span>A leader cannot maintain a personal friendship with certain group-members they are leading without making the non-friends feel disadvantaged. Leaders need to be friendly without being friends. Becoming friends with or maintaining a friendship with a subordinate will create the appearance of favoritism.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
3. How can you be a good and useful member of your society? Discuss
alina1380 [7]
Contribute to the community
Don’t commit any crimes(on purpose)
Vote
Use your knowledge to help others
6 0
3 years ago
Many times, in social psychological research, it is often the case that when internal validity is high, there is a trade-off, an
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

External Validity

Explanation:

Internal and External validity cogitate that whether or not the results of a study are meaningful. Internal validity is related to the structure of the study whereas external validity is related to how relevant is the findings of the study to the real world. Internal validity is a prerequisite to external validity, trade-off or tension between internal and external validity appear upon the analysis.

5 0
3 years ago
What were 2 methods of fighting used by samurai
12345 [234]

Answer:

The combination of these two swords in warfare created myriad techniques for the Samurai to employ.

The Muso Jikiden Eishin-ryu Technique. ...

The Hyoho Niten Ichi-ryu Technique. ...

The Tenshin Shoden Katori Shinto-ryu Technique. ...

The Mugai-ryu Technique. ...

The Ono-ha Itto-ru Technique. ...

The Tamiya-ryu Technique.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • ________ is a type of comedy that reaffirms middle-class morality.
    6·1 answer
  • Which argument would most likely be attributed to a Progressive reformer?
    7·1 answer
  • Because speech is dynamic, phonemes do not possess invariant properties; rather, listeners use the dynamic information in conjun
    11·1 answer
  • Founder of Hinduism ​
    15·2 answers
  • Dale is a 12-year-old boy who wakes up to find that his sheets are wet. his parents explain that he most likely ejaculated durin
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following best illustrates deciding how to produce a specific product?
    15·1 answer
  • Johnny is always wide awake first thing in the morning. This would be a good time for him to study because it is when he has the
    10·2 answers
  • What is the best strategy for overcoming language barriers at work? a) constantly ask people to repeat what they have said b) sp
    7·1 answer
  • How did ancient Chinese in the Manchurian plane live and adapt to the geography?
    9·1 answer
  • Alexander the Great liked to travel to different countries to learn about their cultures. Where did he learn about astronomy?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!