Realist and Liberal perspectives would agree that the international system is inherently anarchic
The notion that there is no supreme authority or sovereign in the world is known as anarchy in the study of international relations. There is no hierarchically superior, coercive authority that can settle conflicts, uphold the law, or regulate the system of international politics in an anarchic state. It is commonly acknowledged that anarchy serves as the foundation for international relations theory.
It is feasible for ordered ties between nations to be maintained in an anarchic international system, contrary to how anarchy is typically understood in the field of international relations. For the realist, liberal, neo- realist, and neo- liberal models of international relations, anarchy provides the underpinnings.
To learn more about Anarchy click here:
brainly.com/question/1133894
#SPJ4
I beleive the answer is: T<span>erminate production of CFCs through finding substitutes.
This action is easier said than done because CFC based product is used by almost all people (they're contained in hairspray and refrigerants)
</span>National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) stated that <span>hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) creates less environmental damage compared to CFC.</span>
In the Election of 2000, Florida was B. a swing state with challenged votes.
All thirteen states had to approve the Articles before it would be in effect.
