1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
3 years ago
12

Which best explains why the Supreme Court’s decision in Regents v. Bakke angered people on both sides of the affirmative action

debate?
A.The Court issued a two-part decision that struck down some parts of affirmative action while upholding other parts.
B.The Court issued a two-part decision that struck down use of affirmative action in medical school admissions only.
C.The Court agreed to allow increased use of racial preferences in California but not in other states.
D.The Court agreed to allow increased use of racial preferences in college and medical school admissions only.
History
2 answers:
nlexa [21]3 years ago
5 0

I believe A is the correct answer.


Vesna [10]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is A.

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was a landmark decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1978. It banned the usage of racial quotas, such as the 16% of seats reserved for minorities that the University of California had established as part of its admission policy. On the other hand, affirmative action was supported, and the Court enabled race to be one of the factors considered for admission at college

You might be interested in
If a historian wanted to determine whether iron tools can be found in the ruins of an ancient African city, which kind of expert
OlgaM077 [116]
He should consult an archaeologist. They study ancient studies looking for remains of buildings, objects, people, etc. They learn a lot about our past and what our ancestors were like through archaeology.
7 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help me !!
AlladinOne [14]

Answer:

The 3rd answer

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select all that appl, Characteristics of Julius Caesar's Rule.
tamaranim1 [39]

The characteristics of Julius Caesar's rule were:

2. Made himself dictator for life.

After his victory in the Battle of Munda, he was appointed dictator for life, consul as well as chief of the roman army. He was named Emperor.

3. Helped the poor.

He took measures to help plebeians to improve their living. Caesar distributed lands and  supplied grains to combat poverty.

8 0
3 years ago
Who was accused of being involved in land dealings and loans in Arkansas that were deemed fraudulent?
lana66690 [7]

Whitewater controversy, Whitewater scandal, or simply Whitewater

5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!
amm1812

Answer:

B

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Jewish people settled into a land that they believed they were promised by God that was known as Canaan. What is the name of
    6·1 answer
  • Northerners mostly agreed that:
    5·2 answers
  • Which was a result of the peace conference led by prince mitternich of austria? europe s monarchies no longer held power. the re
    15·2 answers
  • Why did the US investors demand repayment of debt by Europeans?
    11·1 answer
  • what do you think could have been done to prevent the Great Depression, once the stock market crashed (1929)?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following contributed to the start of the Civil War?
    15·2 answers
  • What might be the most controversial agreement at Yalta?
    5·1 answer
  • According to Edwards, what is every human being’s natural destination upon his or her death?
    6·1 answer
  • A(n) ________ Exposure is a short term or brief exposure that may create an immediate health hazard.
    5·1 answer
  • Why is life so hard is it because we make too many mistakes in our life?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!