1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olenka [21]
4 years ago
15

Why was Martin Luther King Jr more effective than Malcolm X in the Civil Rights Movement?

History
1 answer:
pashok25 [27]4 years ago
8 0
Martin had the whole community and his church and Malcom didn’t
You might be interested in
Which countries are among those suspected of having nuclear programs?
aivan3 [116]
China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, United States
4 0
3 years ago
The global workplace refers to
defon
Generally speaking, the global workplace refers to "<span>C. learning how to deal with clients and customers from other countries", since in the era of globalization, it's quite easy and common to do business outside of domestic borders. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Southerners react to the 15th Amendment?
artcher [175]
The fifteenth Amendment granting African-American guys the proper to vote used to be adopted into the U.S. Constitution in 1870. Despite the amendment, with the aid of the late 1870s discriminatory practices have been used to stop blacks from exercising their proper to vote, specifically in the South. It wasn’t till the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that prison limitations had been outlawed at the kingdom and nearby tiers if they denied African-Americans their proper to vote underneath the fifteenth Amendment.
8 0
3 years ago
What is the one thing that philosophers and scientist have in common
posledela
The right answer for question 1 is D
7 0
3 years ago
describe the embargo act 1807, and at least three issues which arose form the act that worked to divide the nation and ultimatel
Nataly [62]
The Embargo Act of 1807 was a general trade embargo on all foreign nations that was enacted by the US Congress. As a successor or replacement law for the 1806 Non-importation Act and passed as the Napoleonic Wars continued, it represented an escalation of attempts to coerce Britain to stop its impressment of American sailors and to respect American sovereignty and neutrality but also attempted to pressure France and other nations in the pursuit of In the first decade of the 19th century, American merchant shipping grew. Particularly Britain but also France thus targeted neutral American shipping as a means to disrupt enemy trade. American merchantmen, their cargo, and sometimes crew members were seized as contraband of war by European navies, sometimes under cover of official orders. The British Royal Navy, in particular, resorted to impressment and forced some American seamen into naval service on the pretext that the seamen had been "born British" and were still British subjects. Americans saw the Chesapeake–Leopard affair as a glaring example of a British violation of American neutrality.

Congress imposed the embargo in direct response to these events. US President Thomas Jefferson acted with restraint, weighed public support for retaliation, and recognized that the United States was far weaker than either Britain or France. He recommended that Congress respond with commercial warfare, a policy that appealed to Jefferson both for being experimental and for foreseeably harming his domestic political opponents more than his allies, whatever its effect on the European belligerents. The 10th Congress was controlled by his allies and agreed to the Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 1807.

The embargo failed totally. It did not improve the American diplomatic position, highlighted American weakness and lack of leverage, significantly damaged only the American economy, and sharply increased domestic political tensions. Both widespread evasion of the embargo and loopholes in the legislation reduced its impact on its targets. British commercial shipping, which already dominated global trade, was successfully adapting to Napoleon's Continental System by pursuing new markets, particularly in the restive Spanish and Portuguese South American colonies. Thus, British shippers were well-positioned to grow at American expense when the embargo reduced American trade activity.

The embargo undermined American unity by provoking bitter protests, particularly in New England commercial centers. Support for the declining Federalist Party, which intensely opposed Jefferson, temporarily rebounded and drove electoral gains in 1808. The embargo simultaneously undermined Americans' faith that their government could execute laws fairly and strengthened the European perception that the republican form of government was inept and ineffectual.

Replacement legislation for the ineffective embargo was enacted on March 1, 1809, in the last days of Jefferson's presidency. Tensions with Britain continued to grow and eventually led to the War of 1812. general diplomatic and economic leverage.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How many days between april 27, 2014 and january 9, 2017?
    13·1 answer
  • Proponents of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) argued that it would help the U.S. economy by __________.
    9·1 answer
  • Who was elisabeth the first?what was she famous for?
    10·2 answers
  • What is nirvana can you please help me
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following have the two biggest economies in the world?
    8·2 answers
  • The President presents an award to
    14·1 answer
  • The topic is imperialism
    7·1 answer
  • Three major factors in europe that led to world war 1
    8·1 answer
  • A king known as _____________ became a legendary figure in Sumerian literature.
    5·2 answers
  • Do you agree with the concept of a presidential pardon? what were pardons originally intended to do?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!