1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SOVA2 [1]
3 years ago
7

A.3.5 B.-2.5 C.-5.5 D.2.5

Mathematics
1 answer:
mart [117]3 years ago
7 0
The answer is 2.5 because the point is on -1.5, so -1.5+4=2.5
You might be interested in
Write a linear function f with f(−10)=4 and f(−2)=4.
Orlov [11]

f(-10) = 4

f(-2) = 4

Since y is constant while x isnt we just dont need to put x

f(x) = 4

6 0
3 years ago
!!!!Please help!!! I am dying!!
stellarik [79]

Answer:

Therefore (x,y)=(3,7)

Step-by-step explanation:

put the second equation into the first

x+4=3x-2

x-3x=-2-4

-2x=-6

x=3

plug x=3 into the second equation

y=3+4=7

6 0
1 year ago
PLEASE ANSWERRRRRRRRR
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

I thınk the ıntıal value ıs $20 and the rate of change ıs $5

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Pls answer this question it is due in 60 seconds
irga5000 [103]

CMR for the first and MRC for the second

JUST TRUST YOU DON'T HAVE TIME

6 0
3 years ago
Ecosia is one solution to climate change. Why?
balu736 [363]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

NATURAL DISASTERS ARE UP… dramatically

CO2 concentrations in our atmosphere are up … dramatically

TEMPERATURES are up … dramatically

"There is no need to add additional taxes to combat climate change. The best bet is simply QUIT SUBSIDIZING those human activities which causing AGW.

World-wide, Fossil Fuels & industries suck up subsidy Dollars. SUCK UP roughly 6.5% of GDP ... TRILLIONS of DOLLARS in subsidies / supports (non taxable supports & subsidies!) ... In most cases the newer more modern energy and agricultural systems are more profitable and less damaging to the environment already.

So there is no need to tax people to subsidize those things harming the environment, then taxing us again to penalize those same ones we just subsidized!

A house divided against itself cannot stand. -Lincoln (paraphrasing the Bible)

It is time for a strong political leader to take charge and end this deadlock. ... We could either reduce taxes and let the new technologies out compete the obsolete systems we depend on now, or we could keep taxes the same and simply redirect the subsidies we use for fossil fuels and destructive industrialized agriculture towards modern sustainable systems instead. The one thing that won’t work is keep the tax and spend schemes the Neo-Luddites have made for themselves now, and also add even more tax and spend schemes for their competing new technologies too!

Yes that’s right, the top two causes for global warming are heavily subsidized.[1][2][3][4] It is literally insanity. ...

hope this helps have a great morning❤️

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Barney wants to rent a tent. He has to pay a fixed base cost plus a daily rate for renting the tent. The table shows the amount
    14·1 answer
  • What is the value of x in the diagram? A. 100 B. 60 C. 50 D. 120
    14·2 answers
  • In 3 hours, a car travels 120 miles. What is the speed of the car
    11·2 answers
  • Mason bought a clarinet online. It cost $611 plus 21% shipping and handling. What was the total cost?
    12·1 answer
  • Annie is choosing an outfit for the day. She has a choice of three pairs of pants, two shirts, and three pairs of shoes. How man
    13·1 answer
  • Pls Help meh!! I have more Questions based on math coming up in a few seconds Juss pls give meh the best answer
    14·2 answers
  • When Jasper won the jackpot prize of
    9·2 answers
  • SHOW WORK PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • What is 6.5% in tax money
    14·1 answer
  • The answer for this question
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!