All categories

3 years ago

Are KP and PK the same ray? Are NM and MN the same ray? Explain your answer.

Mathematics

1 answer:

Kazeer [188]3 years ago

8 0

KP and PK cannot be the same ray and also NM and MN cannot be the same ray.

Explanation:

A Ray is said to be a single straight unidirectional infinity line. We can determine the starting point of a ray whereas we can't plot the endpoint of the ray.
So PK and KP cannot be the same ray and there can't be the existence of such ray with the two points.
In the same way, NM and MN can't be described as a ray because it doesn't satisfy the requirement of the ray.
Hence the above coordinates cant be the same ray.

You might be interested in

Use Green's Theorem to calculate the circulation of F =2xyi around the rectangle 0≤x≤8, 0≤y≤3, oriented counterclockwise.

Tamiku [17]

Green's theorem says the circulation of $\vec F$ along the rectangle's border $C$ is equal to the integral of the curl of $\vec F$ over the rectangle's interior $D$ .

Given $\vec F(x,y)=2xy\,\vec\imath$ , its curl is the determinant

$\det\begin{bmatrix}\frac\partial{\partial x}&\frac\partial{\partial y}\\2xy&0\end{bmatrix}=\dfrac{\partial(0)}{\partial x}-\dfrac{\partial(2xy)}{\partial y}=-2x$

So we have

$\displaystyle\int_C\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec r=\iint_D-2x\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy=-2\int_0^3\int_0^8x\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy=\boxed{-192}$

6 0

3 years ago

If f(x) = -4x - 6, then f (0.3) = ____.

Ivahew [28]

Answer:

-7.2

Step-by-step explanation:

-4(0.3)-6

-1.2-6

-7.2

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Jaya is painting her room. She mixes 2 pints of blue paint with 5 pints of red paint to get her desired color. Which equation ca

Doss [256]

I am not positive but I think it is 2/5+=x/18

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

X divided by the 4th root of x^9

Alla [95]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Dan bought 8 shirts and 3 pants. Devonte bought 12 shirts and 5 pants. For each person, write a ratio to represent the number of

shutvik [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Dan bought 8 shirts and 3 pants. This means that the ratio representing the number of shirts to the number of pants that Dan bought is 8/3 = 2.67

Devonte bought 12 shirts and 5 pants. This means that the ratio representing the number of shirts to the number of pants that Devonte bought is 12/5 = 2.4

Therefore, they are not equivalent ratios because the relationship is not exactly the same.

3 0

2 years ago