The first 1 and the least one! :)
Because the US was afraid, they gave very little power to the central government.
I believe the answer is: Storage
Our memory is divided in to three parts: Storage, encoding, and retrieval.
Storage is the part where we store all of the new information just after we receive them. These new information later would be encoded to determine whether it's valuable enough for us to keep. If not, these information would be eliminated from the storage.
"Aggressor" is a fairly political and loose term. I believe they were both proportionally bad in the situation. However since you are likely looking for an argument for one side, I suppose I would have to go with the USSR. They started the Berlin blockade which both violated treaties and nearly led to a large war. At the time in Russia, if anyone disagreed with their secular agenda or government they would be exiled. I think it's important though to again point out that contrary to popular belief, both sides got into unwanted wars and did aggressive things during the time and neither should be dubbed the only "aggressor"
Answer:
Retroactive interference
Explanation:
Retroactive Interference: The retroactive interference refers to the process when a particular piece of information being similar in the format of the information that an individual wants to recall.
In other words, the term retroactive interference refers to the process when a recent information hinders in the recall of the older information.
Example: A boy calls his ex-girlfriend by his current girlfriend's name.
In the question above, Jessica's problem is most likely due to the retroactive interference.