true i think i hope its correct dont want you to get it incorrect brainliest plz
Answer:
- 6 bunches of bananas
- 7 pounds of apples
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to assume that a "piece of fruit" is either a bunch of bananas or a pound of apples. Without that assumption, there is insufficient information to work the problem.
Let B represent the number of bunches of bananas. Then 13-B is the number of pounds of apples. The total cost is ...
6B +8(13 -B) = 92
-2B + 104 = 92 . . . . . eliminate parentheses
B = -12/-2 = 6 . . . . . . subtract 104, then divide by the coefficient of B
13-B = 7 . . . . . . . . . . . the number of pounds of apples
The customer bought 6 bunches of bananas and 7 pounds of apples.
_____
<em>Comment on the solution</em>
You will note that finding the value of the variable involved arithmetic with negative numbers. If you want the numbers to stay positive, then you can choose the variable to represent <em>the most expensive</em> of the items: the number of pounds of apples.
1 1/9
To figure out how much walnuts to a pound of dried fruit you’d need to do proportions. So we cross multiply:
2/3 = X
—————- —————-
3/5 = 1
You multiply diagnols 2/3 x 1 = 2/3
3/5 times x is 3/5x.
2/3 = 3/5x. Isolate the variable. Divide 3/5 on both sides cancel out 3/5. 2/3 divide by 3/5 is 2/3 x 5/3 which is 10/9 which equals 1 1/9.
So for 1 lb of dried fruit you need 1 1/9 lb of walnuts to maintain the same mixture
For part A, if P is the center of that triangle, then PR and PT have the same length; therefore, triangle RPT is isosceles. For part B, by the definition of an incenter...if P is an incenter, then it is the place where all the angle bisectors meet. Therefore, angles SRP and PRT are congruent, as are angles STP and PTR. Since the vertex angle measures 64, then each of the base angles by the isosceles triangle theorem measure 58. Half of 58 makes the base angles within the smaller triangle measure 29. And if both of those measure 29, by the triangle angle-sum theorem, 180-29-29 = 122 And that's the measure of angle RPT. Eek.
the evidence does not support the argument because it addresses the bookmobile than the library itself
