Answer:
a. Unearned Revenue; b. Accrued Revenue; c. Accrued Expense; d. Prepaid Expense
Explanation:
Prepaid Expenses : Expenses paid before due
Unearned Revenue : Revenue earned before due i.e Advance Income
Accrued Revenue : Revenue earned i.e due , but not received
Accrued Expense : Expense due but not paid i.e Outstanding Expense
a. Cash received for use of land next month = Unearned Revenue or Advance Income
b. Fees earned but not received in cash = Accrued Revenue / Accrued Income
c. Wages owed but not yet paid = Accrued Expense / Outstanding Expense
d. Supplies on Hand = Prepaid Expense
Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer:
The correct answer is 10.72% ( Approx.).
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Debt ratio = 46.5%
Capital intensity ratio = 2.51 times
Profit margins = 21%
Dividend payout = 38%
Formula to calculate sustainable growth rate ae as follows:
Sustainable growth rate = (Earnings retention rate × Return on equity ) / ( 1 - (ROE × RR)
where, Retention rate =(1 - dividend payout rate)
= (1-0.38) = 0.62
ROE = Profit margin × Total asset turonver × Equity multipler
= Profit margin × 1/capital intensity ratio × 1/(1-debt ratio)
= .21 × (1/2.51) × 1/(1-.465)
= .21 × 0.398 × 1.869
= 0.1562
=15.62%
So, Sustainable growth rate = (0.1562*0.62) / 1 - (0.1562*0.62)
= 0.096844 / 0.903156
= 0.1072
= 10.72% (approx.)
Hence, the correct answer is 10.72% (approx.).
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Under the at risk rules, the amount a tax payer has at risks at the year end is limited to the amount the taxpayer has at the end of the year.
The amount a taxpayer has at risk is increased by the taxpayer's income and decreased by the share of losses and withdrawal from the activity. For partnership, the at risk increases with an increase in debt and vice versa.
Jack's year-end at-risk amount = At risk amount - (interest *loss) = $42,000 - (10% × $60,000 loss) = $36,000
