<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
A court assumes that the written cntarct is the begining and the end of all the terms of the agreement and will not acept the parol evidence if it changes the meaning of the terms of contract.
Parol evidence should only be used to determine the inetntions of the parties at the time the contract was made, not after the fact.
Valid contract: The elemenst of valid contract must be seen.
Since Mrs B signed a contract with the specific terms that did not include a bonus, a court would not consider an oral agreement based on completing a yet to be written contract under the parol evidence rule.
hence, Mrs B cannot introduce the oral agreement under the parol evidence rule.
Answer:
$2,600
Explanation:
Calculation of the value of the company's inventory at the lower of cost or market.
Current FIFO inventory ×Net realizable value
Where,
Current FIFO inventory= 200 units
Net realizable value $13 per unit
Therefore,
200 units *$13 per unit = $2,600.
Lower cost of market can be said to mean that the inventory cost at either the purchase cost or replacement value .
Bases on the information given in the question, replacement cost is lower or lesser than the purchase cost which is why the inventory units are been cost at the replacement value of $13 each.
Answer:
The effect of this error on 2003 ending working capital is that it overstated the ending 2003 working capital.
The error does not have effect on the 2004 ending retained earnings balance.
Explanation:
Let the amount of the commission expense be xxxx.
At the end of 2003, the journal entries should have been as follows:
Debit Commission expense for xxxx
Credie Commission payable for xxxx
Also, we have:
Working capital = Current assets – Current liabilities ………… (1)
From equation (1), current liabilities are understated because commission payable which was not recorded is an item under current liabilities. Since the current liabilities are understated, that indicates that the working capital in equation is overstated. Therefore, the effect of this error on 2003 ending working capital is that it overstated the ending 2003 working capital.
When the 2003 commission expense in the entries above was paid in 2004, it would have been recognized as an expense. This made the error to counterbalance. This implies that the 2004 ending retained earnings balance is still correct despite that there are errors in the earnings of the two years. Therefore, the error does not have effect on the 2004 ending retained earnings balance.
What i would do is multiply the 9 cars by 4 because I need to take the 4 minutes and apply it to all the cars in front of me. 9 x 4 = 36. I calculate that I would wait 36 mins for it to be my turn.
Answer:
The appropriate approach is "Principal-agent problems".
Explanation:
- A contradiction of objectives or priority between someone individual or organization as well as the authorized accompanying documents to operate over its behalf is considered as Principal-agent problem.
- The possession of a commodity or fundamental assigns immediate supervision of that resource to some other agency may transpire in whatsoever circumstance.
