Answer:
attached picture
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
a) The number of visits between the patrons who buys the season passes shows higher frequency than those who did not buy season passes, in general. However, the minimum value of 1 visit is present for both cases.
b) The mean visits of the patrons are just PARAMETERS. If you want to test your hypothesis using hypothesis testing, the statistics are the z or t scores comparing the parameters (means).
c) The proportion who would have paid less are those with 2 or fewer visits because they would only just paid $82 instead of $100.
Number of patrons with 2 or fewer visits: 16
Total number of patrons who bought season passes: 30
Proportion who would've paid less = 16/30 = 0.5333
Step-by-step explanation:
I just did it
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
-13 x 2 = -26
-4 x 2 = -8
14 x 2 = 28
-26 + -8 + 28 +-9 = -15
have a nice day and mark me brainliest! :)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
18 - I took the test on edg.
Answer:
5 is your answer
Step-by-step explanation:
The 
will equal to 5, because 
= 25
