1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valina [46]
3 years ago
9

Who named himself emperor of Mexico in 1812

History
1 answer:
AnnyKZ [126]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Iturbide?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Write a 5-sentence summary on this question
Lelu [443]
Railroad tycoons were the early industrial pioneers amassing or overseeing construction of many large railroads through the early 20th century. The names of the leaders are, James Hill, Jay and George Gould, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Edward Harriman, and Collis P. Cornelius Vanderbilt was a famous industrialist who worked in railroads and shipping.



hope this helps!!
4 0
3 years ago
What happened to religious unity during the protestant reformation?
Mademuasel [1]
It decreased to the point that only there were only really Catholics they wanted to rule the Church and it seemed wrong for people to have other Religions, so the Number of Catholic people Increased. Hope That helped! 
4 0
3 years ago
I’m December of 1956 the Supreme Court ended the bus boycott by ruling that
GuDViN [60]

That is was against the law on any public buses and transportation (public) to have segregation. Everyone was equal on buses and other public transportation.

5 0
3 years ago
What are some military and economic developments that occurred in Eastern Europe?
lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:Explain how Eastern Europe and Western Europe were divided and how they ... With the fall of Communism came economic reforms that shifted countries from ... Communist rule was the development of tourism as an important economic sector. ... helicopters, trains, and heavy military equipment, including tanks and ships.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?
skad [1K]

When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources--whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies--that people from that period left behind.

Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.

In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?

2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?

3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?

4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?

5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?

6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author's choice of words tell you? What about the silences--what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

1. Is it prescriptive--telling you what people thought should happen--or descriptive--telling you what people thought did happen?

2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?

3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of "ordinary" people? From whose perspective?

4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?

5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?

6. If we have read other historians' interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldn't want you to.



hope it helps

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Your topic is to research the achievements of presidents before 1940.
    12·1 answer
  • After the Askikaga Shoguns, Japan was divided into small territories headed by a shogun. True or False
    11·2 answers
  • Which state said they would free blacks if they fought?
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following accomplishments did humans acquire first?
    7·1 answer
  • Given that 1 litre is 1.75 pints and 1 gallon=8 pints
    9·1 answer
  • What kind of graphs can you use to understand how people came
    11·1 answer
  • When did hitler make the jews wear a star on their clothes for identification?
    10·2 answers
  • Jimmy is arrested for assault and tried by a jury and found not guilty. He is then free to go. A few days later ,the police arre
    12·2 answers
  • Why did Phoenician culture spread so far across Mesopotamia?
    11·1 answer
  • Question 2 Multiple choice worth 3 points) Which describes why the Declaration of Independence was written? To just separating f
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!