1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
poizon [28]
3 years ago
6

Rao’s Finance claims that less than 50% of adults in Suva have a will. A will is a legal document that sets forth your wishes re

garding the distribution of your property and the care of any minor children. If you die without a will, those wishes may not be carried out. To substantiate the claim, a random sample of 1000 adults showed that 450 of them have a will. A. At the 5% significance level, can you conclude that the percentage of people who have a will is less than 50%? B. What is the Type I error in part A? What is the probability of making this error? C. What would your decision be in part A if the probability of making a Type I error were zero? Explain.

Business
1 answer:
ddd [48]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A. Check attachment for proportion hypothesis test

B. Type I error is to conclude that less than 50% of adults in Suva have a will when actual probability is less than 0.5

Probability of type I error= significance level= 0.05

C. If type I error is zero, then we would not be able to reject the null hypothesis

You might be interested in
For the month of June, Mae Green budgeted the following amounts: $180 for food, $475 for rent, $15 for transportation, $50 for i
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

No, she did not

Explanation:

In this question, we are asked to answer if Mae stayed within her budget, given her budget and the total amount she later spent.

To solve this problem, what we need to do is to add up all what she budgeted. Afterwards we add up all she spent. Then , we see the difference between the two to actually know if she stayed within her budget of not.

We proceed as follows:;

Let’s calculate budgeted amount: This is ; 180 + 475 + 15 + 50 + 65 + 25 + 150 + 30 = $990

Now, let’s calculate how much she later spent; That would be; 182 + 475 + 12 + 65 + 68 + 12.5 + 36 + 150 = $1000.5

We can see that she spent more that the amount she had budgeted. This means she didn’t stay within the total amount allocated for her budget

3 0
3 years ago
A.j. is applying for a new job with a large company. as part of the application process,
alukav5142 [94]
The appropriate response is Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. It is an institutionalized psychometric trial of grown-up identity and psychopathology. Analysts and other psychological wellness experts utilize different variants of the MMPI to help create treatment arranges; help with the differential conclusion; help answer legitimate inquiries; screen work hopefuls amid the faculty determination handle; or as a component of a restorative evaluation system.
8 0
3 years ago
At the end of the year, Super Shipping has calculated its federal income tax amount for the year to be $10,000. Super Shipping h
Hitman42 [59]

Answer and Explanation:

The journal entry to record the federal income tax expense is shown below:

Federal income tax expense ($10,000 - $4,000) $6,000

        To Federal income tax payable $6,000

(being the federal income tax expense is recorded)

Here the federal income tax expense is debited as it increased the expense and credited the federal income tax payable as it increased the liabilities

5 0
3 years ago
Marco creates a budget for himself. He would like to buy ice cream once a week, but doesn't have enough money to do so in his cu
madam [21]

Answer:

Income

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. Parents are reluctant to subject children to the pain
Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

D) Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.

Explanation:

The conclusion from this argument is that there is no health benefit for the nasal spray vaccine since it was designed to be administered to children, but children rarely get influenza.

The only assumption that strengthens this conclusion is that children do not pass influenza to adults.

  • If this is true, plus the fact that children rarely get influenza, then why would anyone need an influenza vaccine for children.
  • If this assumption was false and children passed influenza to adults, then the conclusion would be wrong because a vaccine would be necessary to prevent children from passing influenza.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Kapanga Manufacturing Corporation uses a job-order costing system and started the month of October with a zero balance in its wo
    5·1 answer
  • Please answer i m confused
    8·2 answers
  • One news wire article in the text has the title "fed cuts key interest rate half-point to 1 percent." assuming the economy is in
    12·1 answer
  • If you could start your own business, what would it be?
    12·2 answers
  • When the laptop market overtook the desktop market, Blue Tech Inc., a leader in desktop technology, was left at a competitive di
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the scenarios is an example of co-branding?
    14·1 answer
  • Assume that you own an investment that will pay you $15,000 per year for 12 years, with the first payment today. You need money
    8·1 answer
  • Being financially responsible is no easy task for any age, but it is certainly the best choice for everyone to follow. One of th
    5·2 answers
  • Still haven't got corona, even a global pandemic don't want me..
    8·1 answer
  • It is argued that it is in the interest of business to protect the environment because:_________
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!