The presidential system selects a head of government independently of the legislature, while in contrast, the head of government in a parliamentary system answers directly to the legislature. Presidential systems necessarily operate under the regulations of separation of powers, while parliamentary methods do not.
<h3>What is the presidential state of government give an example?</h3>
A presidential system is a method of government where a head of government is also head of state and shows an executive branch that is different from the legislative branch. The United States, for instance, has a presidential system.
<h3>What is the difference of parliamentary and presidential?</h3>
In a parliamentary form of government, the powers are divided between the little head and the real head of the state. In a presidential form of government on the other hand the forces are concentrated in the hands of the single executive or the President of the nation.
To learn more about presidential system, refer
brainly.com/question/15453662
#SPJ9
Without you providing us with the diagram, I can still offer you some thought about the effect of the Smoot-Hawley Act and protective tariffs. Sponsored by Senator Reed Smoot and Congressman Willis Hawley, the intent of their tariff act was to protect American jobs during the economic crisis of the Depression. However, when the US imposed protective tariffs, other nations retaliated with tariffs of their own. Thus American exports and imports were cut in half and the Depression grew worse, not better.
We should note this too: While economists agree that Smoot-Hawley worsened the Depression, how large of a factor it was is a matter that economists debate. Some say the tariffs played a minor role compared to other aggravating factors of the Depression. However, the Foundation for Economic Education asserts that the economists who want to minimize the role of the Tariff Act are wrong to do so. Underestimating the negative impact of protective tariffs can be very dangerous economically -- then and now.
The AOC (Articles of Confederation) really limited the power of Congress. They could not...
• Collect Taxes
• Conduct foreign policy
• Could not enforce laws
There were many other problems with the AOC as well. A huge one was that it was practically impossible to amend; all 13 states needed to unanimously agree on a change. Given the rivalry between the States, and the fact that Rhode Island hardly showed up for anything, it would be impossible to fix the AOC.
Congress also could not pay off the national debt. The US owed a whole lot of money after fighting the war. However, due to the fact that Congress couldn’t collect taxes, the government had to print more money which caused massive problems with the economy.
I hope you found this interesting! Good luck!!
Answer:
This is a complex question and is making reconsider my life
Explanation:
Answer:
B
Explanation:
They gave atomic secrets to the Communist Party. I just finished learning about this in my History of the Modern World Class.
