G bmf bknag bra mbgjb;gjbn;adgnbusrkjngb;kjwt]tb'agmfn[wg;lb;oihyoagn b;jqgnbpjsdghajtb; tuehao;h'ojb[ajmgdkhq[ombihj'kmb'iwjhb[i
Answer: B i hope this helps =D
1. [A] Rights that cannot be denied.
2. [C] People have a right to a speedy trial.
3. [C and D] A Government surveillance program
collects personal data and protesters line the entrance to an abortion clinic.
4. [C] Political Right.
The right answer is iron.
Let me explain: During the Civil War, the Confederacy wanted to acquire modern armored ships, therefore, gaining advantage over their adversaries. Somewhere around 1861, the Confederate Congress purchased ships called 'ironclads' from overseas, and a few moths later, they started working on constructing and converting their wooden ships to ironclads, by coating the sides of their ships with iron.
The goal behind this new defense strategy was to make it more difficult for heavy artillery to pierce the ships, thus gaining a new naval advantage over the enemy.
I hope this answer helps! Have a great week :)
1. It encourages international cooperation.
- true!
It
leads to peaceful resolutions of international
conflicts. - well, a bit, but only as an extension of the frist thing- so the frist one is a better option!
It protects fragile ecosystems. - nothing to do with that!
It provides jobs for workers
in developed nations. - not, rather in the developing nation
Which is an argument against free trade?
It can limit environmental protection measures. - i don't think this is a very good option, but its the best of those given. Let's say that one country prohibits production which is enviromentally harmful, but cheap: a free trade would challenge this deciosn.
It leads to
international conflict. - no, i don't think so
It increases the prices for many products. -no, it rather decreases
It
violates basic economic principles.
- no, i don't think si
