How much power should the president have? On one hand, a powerful executive permits quick and decisive action, which is important for responding to current events. On the other hand, if the president gets too powerful, Congress and the people may lack the ability to hold him or her accountable.
“The Executive Department Further Considered,” written by Alexander Hamilton. In this essay, Hamilton argues that a single executive (led by one person as president, rather than several people acting as a council) is the best form for the executive branch of the United States.
He reasons that one president can act more quickly, and with more secrecy when necessary, than a larger group of leaders. He also argues that a single executive is less dangerous to democracy than a council, because it is easier to identify and remove one corrupt person than to discover who among several leaders is a bad actor.
plz mark me as brainliest :)
Answer:
The United States and the Soviet Union were both world superpowers
Explanation:
Answer:
https://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire/republic.html
Explanation:
According to the theory of supply and demand, the market is self-adjusting and companies compete by prices, so the government should interfere as little as possible in the economy.
The government of Ronald Regan followed this logic and was considered a neoliberal government, which advocates reducing the taxation of companies as a form of incentive to production and consequently to the supply of economy, since the productive activity of the companies corresponds to the aggregate supply of an economy (everything that goes on sale in the market).
In addition to the reduction in corporate taxation, the economic package called "Reaganomics" implemented a reduction in public spending, a reduction in income taxation and a deregulation of the economy. The consequences were economic growth, but with increasing social inequality between rich and poor.
